A TORY candidate has entertainingly demonstrated the dangers of blogging in the early hours of the morning.
Richard Graham, the Tories’ hope for the Gloucester seat, has described his Labour opponent, Parmjit Dhanda MP, as… well, there’s no nice way of saying this, so I’ll try rhyming slang: as a “Crispin Blunt”.
I saw a print out of the original article earlier this afternoon. But it has, needless to say, been tidied up somewhat and it now reads thus:
For anyone aspiring to be an MP it’s been pretty depressing to see how ridiculed politicians have become. ‘You’re all the same’ is the cry on the doorstep – but of course they/we are not, even if the Telegraph has unearthed an awful lof of bad apples. It was reassuring both yesterday and today to meet people who realised that and just want to see some honesty and hard work from their councillor.
In case you didn’t realise, it was the last word in that paragraph that originally concluded with a word that rhymes with “stunt”. But instead of admitting the schoolboy prank, Graham pretended that what he meant to say was “councillor”.
Now, setting aside what this says about his attitude towards local representatives on the council, does Graham really think the good citizens of Gloucester are stupid? ”Their councillor”? That doesn’t even make sense. The last time I looked, the expenses scandal was engulfing Westminster, not Gloucester Town Hall. He even starts out with the words “For anyone aspiring to be an MP…” and then changes (in the new, revised version) to “councillor”.
Given that Graham was trying to smear Parmjit at the time, this embarrassing lapse of judgment and common sense, not to mention intelligence, couldn’t have happened to a nicer bloke.
What a merchant banker.














Monday 18 May 2009 at 10:59 pm
stupid cupid – stop picking on me !
Sounds like a publicity stunt to me !
Monday 18 May 2009 at 11:01 pm
It still doesn’t make sense if you reinsert the original (alleged) word.
“…just want to see some honesty and hard work from their c***” makes no more sense than “councillor”, unless Graham is implying that the people on the doorstep and very depressed at their lack of sexual prowess.
If I’m reading it right, the correct word ought to have been “candidate”.
Monday 18 May 2009 at 11:15 pm
Yes Tom, it obviously has become a term of abuse inside the Tory party. One idiot uses the phrase so the entire Tory party must be using it.
Not a great post.
Is everything that you say Labour policy then?
Monday 18 May 2009 at 11:19 pm
A life long supporter of the labour party was lying on his death bed when he suddenly decided to join the Tory party.
“But why?” asked his puzzled friend, “You’re labour through and through… Why change now?”
The man learned forward and explained, “Well, I’d rather it was one of them that died and not one of us.”
Enjoy
Tuesday 19 May 2009 at 12:35 am
Ad hominem attacks are the last resort of the outwitted and outclassed.
Even I, laudable intellectual as I aspire to be am not immune to the lures of a sleazy four-lettered putdown now and then.
Nonetheless, better to attack the issues than the person.
I’m sure, for all his back-handed double-dealing machinations, GB is probably quite a nice bloke, a loving father and all-round OK chap.
Just like I’m sure, for all your support for the disastrous Union, neo-fascist-leaning policies on civil liberties and a complete disregard for the problems that over-population and intensive migration (from within and without the EU) can cause, that you’re really a nice bloke, loving father etc etc.
Sometimes (and we see it in the papers quite a bit this week) personal attacks are just pathetic and weak vilification done purely because the issues aren’t as easily attacked.
And equally, sometimes a personal attack is warranted because the person has done something wrong; not just supported a bad policy, but done wrong, like claimed hundreds of thousands of pounds of *our* money to buy a house, tax-free. Or to get their home spruced up, or buy a new flat-screen telly.
The trick is being able to spot which is which.
Tuesday 19 May 2009 at 12:39 am
I don’t know why you’ve blogged about this one, I must admit. The Devil’s Kitchen called you a “smug [C-word]” and you treat it as a badge of honour. Dhanda would be wise to follow the same approach.
Tuesday 19 May 2009 at 6:07 am
Shock horror. One UK politician calls another a rude word.
I have news for you Tom. There are approximately 40 million adults in mainland Britain and about 65% of them in a recent poll called MPs a lot of rude words…
UK MPs are frankly risible: any suggestion that yesterday’s HOC farce represents democracy is a bad joke. The system is beyond repair and needs a drastic overhaul. MPs require 6 months’ community service to reconnect with the real world
Tuesday 19 May 2009 at 7:56 am
Did you also notice all the spelling mistakes and poor grammar in the original piece? That must be worrying for the right-leaning folk of Gloucester; the Tories think so little of the city that they’ve picked as their candidate a semi-literate man who doesn’t even bother to re-read stuff before he posts it.
And he comes from the Cotswolds!
Tuesday 19 May 2009 at 9:32 am
I must not blog while drunk.
I must not blog while drunk.
I must not blog while dr…..
Tuesday 19 May 2009 at 9:47 am
To clarify the final paragraph in my previous comment: “comes from the Cotswolds” roughly translates into Glaswegian as “stays at Bearsden”. The Cotswold Hills make up the east of our glorious county and spill over into the Home Counties around Burford.
A high proportion of the area’s occupants are wealthy incomers and/or second home owners. They are thus admirably represented by Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP.
He’s the only one of our county’s six MPs so far to have been fingered by* the Telegraph in its expenses exposures. He is said to have flipped his original second home and then sold it to help with the acquisition of his current humble weekend dwelling for which he paid £2.7m.
The MP for the neighbouring Tewkesbury constituency also caused a few raised eyebrows during the last round of expenses shock and awe when it was revealed that he employs not only his wife but also his ex-wife as assistants. Keeping things in the family is a fine Tory tradition.
The Tory county councillors from the area were dubbed the “Cotswold Cavalry” apparently by a Tory councillor from Gloucester who was miffed by their policies which tend to favour the country (carefully typed) set over the city oiks.
* “fingered by” was the colourful expression attributed to Parmjit by our local paper in the four-letter-word story on its web site yesterday.
The piece attracted much attention from the merry pranksters who like to comment. Harking back to your earlier post, they also tend to be rightish libertarians with too much time on their hands who wish, as all such people do, the world to be a lot more straightforward that it really is.
Tuesday 19 May 2009 at 11:01 am
@ Grim Reaper:
It’s one thing being insulted by a prat and treating it as a badge of honour.
It’s quite another thing being the prat doing the insulting.
Tuesday 19 May 2009 at 11:48 am
Pedants corner, the correct cockney rhyming slang is “Berkshire Hunt” guvnor. Hence you call someone a “Berk.”
My mother would not approve.
Tuesday 19 May 2009 at 2:42 pm
@ Brian Hughes
‘The Tory county councillors from the area were dubbed the “Cotswold Cavalry” apparently by a Tory councillor from Gloucester who was miffed by their policies which tend to favour the country (carefully typed) set over the city oiks.
* “fingered by” was the colourful expression attributed to Parmjit by our local paper in the four-letter-word story on its web site yesterday.
The piece attracted much attention from the merry pranksters who like to comment. Harking back to your earlier post, they also tend to be rightish libertarians with too much time on their hands who wish, as all such people do, the world to be a lot more straightforward that it really is.’
You are *that* Brian Hughes, then? Currently a Labour candidate for the council elections in Cheltenham (which is a thankless task, as the current line-up is split between LD and Tories, and what chance in hell do Labour have?).
Whether a ‘Tory councillor’ coined the phrase “Cotswold Cavalry”, you and your mate Shaun Shute ran with it.
And I’m not ‘rightish’, but I’m beginning to think I maybe a libertarian, if a libertarian is someone who believes they have the right to express their candid opinions, without censorship. Not something your boss believes, which I guess makes him more of an authoritarian?
Tuesday 19 May 2009 at 3:21 pm
Merchant banker, eh?
Quite rude, for you!
Leave a comment