AFTER weeks of coverage of scandal, of reports of MPs flipping the designation of their second homes, and using public money to pay for non-existent mortgages, adding another turret to their country pile and housing families of ducks in London penthouses, I think it’s clear what is required.
And following on from the contributions from my two Labour colleagues, Alan Johnson and John Denham, and the suggestion by William Hague on fixed-term parliaments, it’s clear now that there is only one option open to us to clean up parliament and restore voters’ faith in democracy: we need to redesign the Union flag.

A Union flag yesterday
Of course, there will always be those who want to detract attention from this, the most important issue of our time, by banging on about holding errant MPs to account, exposing dishonest claims and reforming the expenses system.
But they must not be allowed to succeed!
How can we function as a nation when the national flag we use today is the same one that flew during the days of the hated and despised British Empire? Surely the most urgent task before us is to redesign the flag so that it is truly represenative of all Britain’s cultures and sexualities?
If we did that, then turnout at the next general election (proportional representation, natch) would be at least 100 per cent, and all MPs would be loved to bits by everyone — especially the media. The recession would end, global warming would slow down and all wars would cease.
Let’s not be distracted by issues like MPs’ expenses. It’s too easy to assume such issues are important just because everyone is really angry about them. But let’s face it: how many ordinary voters actually write columns for the national media? That’s right — almost none! So what do they know?
Let’s deal with the real issues confronting the nation: electoral reform, fixed-term parliaments. online voting and, of course, the redesign of the national flag.
Onwards and upwards, comrades! Onwards and upwards…














Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 1:50 pm
OK, that’s funny. ;o)
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 1:53 pm
Isn’t that picture of the Union flag upside-down??
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 2:01 pm
Only if you assume the flag pole is on the right.
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 2:03 pm
Very good, Tom, very funny. Not only did it make me laugh, which is a rare occurance for a blog (although not too rare for yours), but I completely agree with the underlying point. I’m glad to see a beacon of sensibility such as yourself is bashing these attempts to usher in random and irrelevant “reforms”. Thank God you’re so widely read, hopefully the powers that be take note!
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 2:05 pm
The flag is the right way up.
It’s the country that’s upside down.
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 2:08 pm
Crackin’ idea Mr H. How about… hmm… we get rid of the red bits, maybe the white cross in the middle, and – oh – a few more splodges of blue. How would that be? A nice white ‘X’ on a blue sky field. Luvverly…
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 2:21 pm
Was only joking earlier… but could the next flag be symmetrical so it’s the right way up no matter what? I’m pretty sure that is the root cause of all our problems
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 2:24 pm
Awful idea Mr Harris!
For good or bad the union flag represent our history. It symbolises everything we’ve done as a nation. It symbolises both the achievements and disgraces of empire. It symbolises the unity and the division of the United Kingdom. It represents a nation always striving to be better, but never arrogant enough to refuse to admit its flaws or crimes. The union flag represent what we are and how we got here, and that, we should never forget!
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 2:33 pm
Very good. But is it a flag or a Jack? We must have answers.
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 2:34 pm
Liberanos – Pure genius.
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 2:41 pm
Typical ZaNu Liebour politician. Spots the problem but then offers no constructive solution. What exactly would YOU do with the flag? I guess it’s Thatchers fault too
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 2:44 pm
Steev Green at 2.33 pm: “But is it a flag or a Jack? We must have answers.”
It’s only called a “Union Jack” if it’s flying from a ship at sea.
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 3:10 pm
Can we take the blue bits out of the flag please?
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 3:14 pm
Time out, people! Are you lot taking this post seriously or are you just trying to wind me up?
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 3:17 pm
Tom,
What about shore bases?
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 3:21 pm
Being an ex-sailor and having sailed many a concrete figate (shore base), I’m sure we called it a Jack. (could be wrong – I was drunk for quite a lot of my time).
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 3:38 pm
We’re never sure which post are serious and which ones are part of that iconic brand of Tom Harris humour. Perhaps you should label your posts so we know which ones are which!
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 3:41 pm
tbuoD ti evetS (B.R.D) tub knaht ouy
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 3:44 pm
Ben, I think my readers are intelligent enough to tell the difference, but for the absence of doubt, check the categories posts are filed under.
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 3:51 pm
Not a bad idea actually.
The current one’s much too complicated for a start… maybe if we just have one colour (say red) and maybe just leave it mainly blank…
Oh! You could have a little design in the corner – something catchy but gritty – maybe tools or farm implements… hmmm
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 3:53 pm
Well even I – half senile as I ma – can tell a joke..
(most Labour blogs are a joke:-)
Nice post Tom, too many earnest naive people around – thinking reforming the voting system will change how Parliament,the Government and MPs operate.
Although “operate” is a misnomer : perhaps “malfunction”?
Keep the jokes coming: the Euros may need another one.
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 4:04 pm
Tom Just hold a general election and we the people will sort it out for you.
We just cannot wait to be rid of this ‘Rotton Parliament’.
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 4:19 pm
Scotsman wants to redesign Union Jack shock horror.
Coming up next week – Tom Harris reveals evidence that confirms the Pope is actually a Catholic.
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 4:30 pm
Only a minor point Tom, but isn’t the Secretary of State for the Department of Innovation, Universities and Skills called John Denham, rather than Alan?
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 4:58 pm
SJM – yes, you’re right, of course.
Grim Reaper – you really are utterly humourless, aren’t you? Do you really need for a post to be categorised as “Whimsy” for you to understand it’s a joke?
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 5:11 pm
@Tom Harris, it seems mine isn’t the only head this one has gone over!
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 5:18 pm
Brilliant ! The best blog post I have seen all week.
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 5:24 pm
Did you know flags is my main area of business? Our flag is called the Union Flag, but I often call it the Union Jack as that’s what everyone knows it as, but it’s wrong of me, although some people buy them for their yachts, so who am I to judge?
By the way, I am planning to distribute EU flags round the town for free, starting in a couple of days. I’m trying to find a good red ink or paint for the giant X through them that will be weatherproof.
I hope to put some pics on my blog round about election day.
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 5:33 pm
I understand that this is a joke, and some people are clearly not taking the post as it was intended, BUT, there is a case to argue – Why is the cross of St. David not included on the flag….?
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 5:34 pm
No matter Tom, I found it humorous.
Then when people started responding as if it was serious I did wonder for a bit
)
Though given some of the utterances from MPs it is understandable why some people didn’t twig.
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 6:00 pm
OK, having read your blog again i get that its not serious, and feel kinda stoopid for writing my impassioned reply in defence of the flag. However saying that, it is still kind of lacking,…..well….humour really! isn’t it!?
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 6:26 pm
LOL Tom!
Obviously there are some posters who are lacking in the observation stakes. Any thread that is categorised as ‘whimsy’ is hardly going to be serious.
What next Tom a post on how changing the leader of the Labour party would be equally spurious?
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 6:52 pm
@Liam, 5:33pm
The flag of St David isn’t recognised because Wales is a principality and not a kingdom. The kingdoms of England, Ireland and Scotland are represented on the Union flag.
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 7:00 pm
I was joking. Hopefully that came across. If only we could categorise our comments too.
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 7:31 pm
Hallelujah for a bit of light relief!
Nice post, Tom!
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 7:39 pm
Great idea. The electorate could become involved through a national competition to design the new flag, perhaps judged by Simon Cowell with a public vote. And while we’re at it, maybe Andrew Lloyd Webber could be asked to write us a brand, sparkly new anthem too? It’s about time Britain was modernised.
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 9:46 pm
I am sure that the gold of St David, or the green from y ddraig goch can be added somewhere to the Union Flag. Wasn’t this suggested as an idea from the floor of the House at some point….
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 10:26 pm
Liam: It was I believe, by the (now) Lord Ellis Thomas (I believe).
Sadly, from a graphical standpoint (being I a graphics designer), a 4th colour on the Union flag would be totally nasty looking. Y Ddraig Goch can’t be represented easily on the Union flag. I’ve got a better idea. How about we all get a referendum on independence (something none of the UK’s countries have had, incidentally), and in the mean time, we abandon the Union flag in favour of the constituent members flags, since we can’t yet all agree on if we want to be a Union any more?
That’d be more sensible, and it’d give the flag makers a bit of economic stimulus. Well, some of them. I already have a Saltire and a Ddraig Goch in my house…
Tuesday 26 May 2009 at 11:35 pm
Hi Tom – I’ve just designed a new flag.
Wednesday 27 May 2009 at 12:06 am
[...] a good idea, but I am not sure that they are the response that the public are looking for. Tom Harris has it right when he suggests (with considerable humour) that this may be something of a diversion away from the [...]
Wednesday 27 May 2009 at 1:29 am
Ben, I think my readers are intelligent enough to tell the difference, but for the absence of doubt, check the categories posts are filed under.
No Tom ,
You’re wrong ,
We’re not .lol .
Saturday 13 June 2009 at 10:45 pm
[...] is, as Tom Harris noted, a red [...]
Leave a comment