LAST night, on my return from the Commons, I stayed up well beyond bedtime, eschewing my Horlicks, in order to watch the last ever episode of Battlestar Galactica.
First off: how cool is that name? It was probably the only good thing about the original series which, in most other respects, was as rubbish as a pile of rubbish that’s been dumped in Rubbishville’s municipal rubbish tip. So I was surprised as anyone when it was announced a remake was on the way.
As in the original series, human civilisation, spread among 12 space-travelling colonies, is all but wiped out by an attack by the evil Cylons which, in the newer version, were originally created by the humans themselves as robot slaves. What’s left of mankind — about 50,000 souls — form a convoy, led by the colonies’ last remaining battlestar warship, the Galactica, and attempt to seek a new home, the mythological “13th colony” of Earth.
Battlestar Galactica is a slow burner. I watched the mini series that kicked the whole thing off, and thought it was interesting, intelligent, with great special effects, but also a bit clinical, with very few sympathetic characters. So I didn’t bother watching the subsequent series initially. But word started to circulate that here was science fiction worth paying attention to. I was intrigued, particularly when I saw an advert on Sky which described it as “the only science fiction which explores the war on terror” or some such. So I started watching the box set DVD collections.
Season one was extremely enjoyable; a bit slow but with a tremendous cliffhanger ending. Season two, with the introduction of a battlestar previously assumed destroyed, the Pegasus, and its authoritarian admiral Cain, provided the dramatic and emotional pinnacle of the whole series, with some amazing scripts, acting and moral paradoxes. The “war on terror” parallel reaches a height during the first part of season three, where the surviving humans have established a colony on New Caprica, only for it to be invaded and occupied by the Cylons. A campaign of suicide bombings by the humans against their robot oppressors and a systematic campaign of intimidation, torture and summary execution by the Cylons and their human collaborators ensue, throwing up none-too-subtle comparisons with Iraq. A brave thing for any US-made science fiction TV series to attempt.
One over-arching thread throughout the series is a religious one, and a debate about whether the human colonies’ traditional multiple gods should be replaced by a single God. There are tons of religious or pseudo-religious allusions and discussions among the characters, and they don’t always sit comfortably with the rest of the space opera.
Nevertheless, Battlestar Galactica is intelligent and grown up. It’s refreshing to see science fiction for adults being produced in an age when almost everything seems to be produced for teenagers. Most of the characters are in their thirties or older, and virtually all of them are morally ambiguous; even the flawed Baltar — the main villain of the original 1978 series — comes across most of the time as sympathetic, though selfish and cowardly.
Richard Hatch, who starred in the original series as Apollo, returned to the re-imagined series, as Tom Zarek, a sometime politcian, hero, terrorist and villain. But the central figure is Admiral William Adama, Galactica’s commander, played brilliantly by Edward James Olmos (known to West Wing fans as President Bartlett’s eventual Supreme Court nominee, Judge Roberto Mendoza). The fact that the producers went to great lengths to secure the talents of so many fine actors is a testament to how seriously they considered their job. The most controversial decision they made was to cast a woman in the role of Starbuck who, in the original series had been played by Dirk Benedict (The Face in The A Team, if you’re interested). The only controversy for me is that Katee Sackhoff irritated the hell out of me in every screen appearance she made in four years.
In the end, as I discovered last night, it’s virtually impossible to provide answers to all the puzzles and mysteries that have been invented by the writers in the previous four years. Elements of the finale were unsatisfying, others quite moving and uplifting.
If you haven’t watched it so far, and if you want science fiction that actually makes you think and care about the characters, then make an effort to catch it on DVD.
So say we all.















Tuesday 14 July 2009 at 12:39 pm
I concur! BSG is well worth a view, and though I do like it, it really did annoy me that Starbuck was a girl. Probably because I was in the minority of enjoying the original!
Tuesday 14 July 2009 at 12:40 pm
Oh – cobblers. Live long and prosper, Tom Harris.
Tuesday 14 July 2009 at 12:44 pm
To be frank, the finale was dire.
Not at all a fitting end to a fantastic series.
Tuesday 14 July 2009 at 12:57 pm
I have to agree with this article. http://io9.com/5313848/did-battlestar-galactica-have-the-worst-ending-in-science-fiction-history?skyline=true&s=i
Tuesday 14 July 2009 at 1:18 pm
“One over-arching thread throughout the series is a religious one, and a debate about whether the human colonies’ traditional multiple gods should be replaced by a single God. There are tons of religious or pseudo-religious allusions and discussions among the characters, and they don’t always sit comfortably with the rest of the space opera.”
Sounds like they’re training the masses to accept a One World Religion = worship of the Beast. (see Revelation)
I’m not surprised it sits uncomfortably. Remember my comments a week or two ago about writers always promoting something or other?
How about this? Dean Haglund (X-Files; Lone Gunmen) “confirmed that government officials would regularly attend Hollywood parties and submit ideas to be planted in film and TV scripts.”
Unplug yourselves from unreality.
(I just made that one up!)
Tuesday 14 July 2009 at 2:52 pm
Hi Tom,
I think that BSG was the best sci-fi series I’ve ever watched. Star Trek was a bit too moralising (I wanted to shoot anyone who said the Prime Directive in ST-NG).
This series covered so many issues, including Iraq, ethnic cleansing, religions, I could go on. Unlike you, I quite liked Katee Sackhoff’s Starbuck – thankfully they didn’t bring back any annoying kids or mechanical dogs from the original series! I thought some of the references to the 70’s show were well done too.
Anyone who likes sci-fi should watch this.
Tuesday 14 July 2009 at 4:31 pm
I dispare.
Tuesday 14 July 2009 at 4:36 pm
It’s a fantastic show and clearly the best SF of its era; it tackled, as the greatest SF should, the dominant themes of our time, from cataclysmic attacks like 9/11 (destruction of the colonies) through to the horrors of Abu Gaharib (the Pegasus rape-torture arc). The use of music was impressive and to be honest, I thought Starbuck (Katie Sackhoff) was meant to be irritating and hard to like – that defensive prickliness was part of the nuancing present in most of the characters. My sole criticism of the whole series would be the tendency of Adama in season 4 to roll around on the floor, clawing at walls and crying his eyes out. Happened once to often in my book!
The musings on religion and, from the Caprica pilot, the implied proclivity of monotheistic faiths for suicide bombing will provide ample murky waters for the new prequel’s plot to wade about it!
Tuesday 14 July 2009 at 5:14 pm
That’s my birthday present sorted then, lets just hope Amazon can get it to me in time for Friday.
Tuesday 14 July 2009 at 7:05 pm
BSG is startling good drama, Scifi or otherwise.
But having just watched Torchwood children of earth, it seems like there is a theme developing: The real monsters are humans, they are the ones we have to fight not “toasters” or space monsters.
Tuesday 14 July 2009 at 7:22 pm
Confusing as hell I thought It was only a week after I watched the last episode that it occured to be the two earths they visited were different planets, not the same planet with a bit of time travel.
I always prefered the shadows in Babylon 5.
Tuesday 14 July 2009 at 7:49 pm
Let’s hope Caprica is good, have seen the pilot which was very good, although no spaceships… if you can get a copy to view I recommend it.
Tuesday 14 July 2009 at 8:33 pm
Ok, Ok, you want a show – you can have one. Wee story. Tom isn’t posting that much at the moment – he’s considering his position – so the ducks aren’t getting fed (hat-tip to Sammy). Result – they’re eating each other.
Ok, story. When I went to Tom’s AGM he had two apparatchiks with him. They seemed to know who I was. I got a very strange look from one of them.
Anyway, anyway, Tom introduces himself and the apparatchiks and says they are only there to throw troublemakers out. Polite titters from the 9 other
people who turned up. But not from me. Nooo sirree Bob. I sat there with a face like a sink. See, I knew he meant it and that Yagoda and Yezhov were entirely up for the square go.
Tuesday 14 July 2009 at 8:40 pm
Moral? That’s the Labour party in Glasgow for you.
Leave a comment