I WAS 20 years old when I decided that I wanted to devote my life to politics. For me that didn’t just mean having the ambition to be elected one day as an MP; it meant wanting to make a contribution to the benefit of my country.
That sounds pompous, doesn’t it? I agree, it does. But it was and is true, so I don’t care.
The men and women I work with, people from different parties, are some of the best individuals I’ve ever had the privilege to meet or work with. Some of those people, the ones I describe as among the “best”, were fingered in the Great Expenses Scandal of ‘09. Nevertheless, my and others’ respect and liking for them remains. Many who were caught up in that exposé have decided to call it a day at the next election, as have many others who emerged from the episode relatively or entirely unscathed.
That is a matter of great regret, for me as well as, I suspect, for them. The House of Commons is not a den of thieves, of “troughers”, to use one of the less imaginative and attractive epithets in common usage. I can put it no better than Tony Blair did in his last appearance at the despatch box on 27 June, 2007:
Some may belittle politics but we who are engaged in it know that it is where people stand tall. Although I know that it has many harsh contentions, it is still the arena that sets the heart beating a little faster. If it is, on occasions, the place of low skulduggery, it is more often the place for the pursuit of noble causes.
Those comments, of course, were made before this year’s expenses scandal. I wonder if Tony would still have made them if the scandal had come first? I hope he would have, because they are as true today as they ever have been.
There is no shortage of those who want to disparage politicians and politics. They are wrong. But it is difficult to make a case for politics in the current climate. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t.
Because politics is a noble and honourable pursuit. It was so at other times in our history when the public and the media held us in contempt. As I’m fond of reminding interviewers, when the Houses of Parliament burned to the ground in 1834, a crowd gathered on the other side of the Thames and cheered. Colleagues who fret that public esteem of politicians is at a dangerous low should bear in mind that, although it’s necessary to try to improve public opinion, they should manage their expectations; politicians have always been despised. We will always be despised. Sometimes the degree of contempt waxes and wanes throughout the years and through events. But we will never be loved. That is not why we’re in public life.
We are in public life because, as I said at the start, we want to make a contribution to the benefit of our country, to the condition of our fellow citizens. Every single MP I know does that in his or her working life every week; we communicate, we ask questions (of our constituents as well as of ministers), we lobby on behalf of the people we represent, and, on far more occasions than we’re ever credited for, we help people. We make a positive difference. We do good, and we work hard doing it.
Those are the realities of life as an MP. We’re not saints, nor should we be. Neither are we villains. We’re ordinary people who have been given an extraordinary opportunity.
There have been points in recent weeks when MPs have felt less than proud of our vocation (or profession, if you prefer). I’ve even felt the need to apologise to those who ask me what I do for a living. And I was wrong, because there is no reason to apologise for the fact of being an MP, of being chosen by your party and then your constituents to perform an important job.
One colleague, the day before the House rose for the recess, asked some of us, in all seriousness, how we would respond if asked by people we might might meet on holiday what we do for a living. It was his genuine concern about the anticipated negative reactions to his mumbled, apologetic confession of “I’m an MP” that inspired me to write this post. Because my colleague is a good guy. He should be proud of who he is and what he does.
I will never again be reluctant to advise young people in my local schools to go into politics. If you want to make that difference in people’s lives, in the life of our nation, there’s no better way — there’s no alternative, in fact — to taking a deep breath, holding your nose (if you feel you must) and taking the plunge into party politics. I will, however, advise them to avoid it unless they know they can develop a thick skin.
There. That’s what I think. I should have said it long ago. Do your worst.














Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 9:12 am
“If you want to make that difference in people’s lives, in the life of our nation, there’s no better way — there’s no alternative, in fact — to taking a deep breath, holding your nose (if you feel you must) and taking the plunge into party politics. ”
Of course if you really want to make a difference to peoples lives, without being a monumental drain on tax-payers, you would start a business, build up a large work-force of local people, offer training and personal development opportunities, and pay your bills and taxes on time.
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 9:20 am
The only thing that annoys me about this post is that it’s a piece of writing in which Tony Blair is quoted that I agree with pretty much every word.
I would say that the vast majority of politicians I’ve met from across all parties, even, on occasion, the Tories, for goodness’ sake, are decent people who are in it because they want to make people’s lives better. That’s a lot of people in 26 years of political activity.
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 9:26 am
An interesting post and well worth stating.
I respect your perspective, I don’t however agree with it.
When MPs stop navel gazing and trying to score petty points over the opposition and really start achieving objectives and talking about what they are actually going to do themselves or as a political party, then respect may return.
Being an MP is a tenure of office, not a career, not a profession. The electorate provide you with a mandate for a period of time, MPs need to understand this. You have no right to a seat in the House of Commons and far too many of your colleagues appear to forget this.
Telling people how useless the Tories are, or the Greens are, or the BNP, does nothing more than turn people off. This approach is condescending. Much of the electorate is not thick and could work out for themselves what the other parties do and stand for if any of you actually answered a straight question with a straight answer, we need to understand what you (of which ever party) are standing for.
Stop playing the media game, it impresses no-one other than the political garden party. Changing your mind, is not the sin Nick Robinson would have you believe. But of course you all jump on that band wagon, because you are too mypoic to look beyond the Westminster swamp.
Breaking manifesto commitments, which used to actually matter is not a way to gain respect.
I am sure there are one or two MPs who actually believe they are there to make a difference, but far too many of your colleagues have become nothing but lobby fodder, because you really believe this is a career option and as such of course are treated with contempt.
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 9:32 am
It must be great being an MP Tom, 82 days holiday in the Summer alone, even I don’t get that – and I’m a college lecturer LOL.
Then there’s all those lovely expenses . . . mmm, yum.
And I see that a closed commons committee comprising of Speaker Bercow, Harman and Alan Duncan from the Baby eating Tories have agreed to a £25 a day expenses package which requires NO receipts and NO questions asked – which adds up to well over £9,000 pa – and this has been so “openly discussed’ on the day parliament breaks up for 82 days eh?
All of which goes to show that Gordon’s much vaunted (by him) ‘reform’ of Parliamentary standards was just another Labour Lie and MP’s are back at the trough as if the whole expenses scandal (AND IT IS A SCANDAL, Tom!) had never happened.
You may think being an MP is a higher calling . . . I’m afraid that the rest of us think it’s a licence to trough.
Only 10 months to go.
)
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 9:35 am
@Silent Hunter: Silent – measured and objective as always. You sound a very bitter individual. Don’t read this – it’s not suitable for those who refuse to listen to facts rather than paranoia.
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 9:36 am
Excellent post, Tom. Although I would contend that other ways in which one can make a real difference to people’s lives are through any of the public services….even, dare I say it, another despised profession: NHS management (Yes, I am one!).
On another matter – what’re your views on MPs having other jobs? You are a professional politician, and that is something to be proud of. However, is there not also a place in the HoC for those with other interests. Should there not be a mix? It seems a real pity that we are losing Howard Stoate, practising GP at the next election, simply because he feels that the senior people in his party have decided that to be in the HoC you can only be an MP, and not do anything else. Surely no one can doubt that he is “one of the good ones” and has made a real contribution both to the HoC and to public life in general?
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 9:37 am
@Andy Ibbs: I don’t support the new restrictions at all. I wrote about it here.
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 9:40 am
“But we will never be loved.”
Oh I don’t know… I love politicians. But then again I would say that
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 9:44 am
you and your colleagues certainly have made a difference to many peoples’ lives. Thanks to people like you Tom, 1,000,000 people in Iraq no longer have their lives to enjoy. Hope that fulfills your ambitions
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 9:45 am
Politics may be a noble calling, just a shame that so many of the modern politicians are in it for the money.
As Trotsky recognised, a party based on fabian principles (the labour party most of the time) isn’t in power to liberate the people it is there to impose a stifling illiberal minority view on the people.
As has been mentioned, politician isn’t a profession (no qualifications apart from a gift for the gab and networking is required) and you insult true professionals (engineers, doctors, nurses, etc) by using it.
It is at best a calling, at worst a desire to impose your beliefs on others or to agrandise yourselves.
All MPs are culpable in the profligate scandal; either they deliberately took money under false pretence or stood idly by whilst their associates did.
Some have said they’ll stand down few have reigned, waiting for the nice pay off and the biggest pension they can muster.
Some have been upset about being found out, rather like a burglar when caught is upset.
You may but your associates really don’t understand honour and morality is a word little understood by MPs though oft misused (moral compass springs to mind, shame it lines up east-west).
The mantra that is was allowed doesn’t justify doing it, especially as you and your associates wrote the rule book.
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 9:48 am
Tom,
You’ve missed the point entirely. How is voting for your party at every possible occasion representing the views of the electorate ?
Why do we need so many MP’s all just voting along party lines ?
Do you really believe MP’s give good value to the country ? You, personally, have voted in some of the most obscene legislation that removes the rights of citizens – remember you voted to remove the right of spontaneous peaceful protest.
In return for these laws MP’s have claimed expenses which equal, roughly, the annual net income of an average person (and then get a salary on top.)
Politics may be an honourable calling, however, the MP’s we have at the moment HAVE betrayed the morals and ideals of what a representative democracy tries to do.
You tell us that many good people have resigned. Shame not more as we need a clear-out and proper accountability. The rules MP’s put in place to stop corruption were literally not worth the paper they were written upon. But then, that was the point, wasn’t it ?
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 9:55 am
A brave and bold post, but the sad reality is that the reputation of MPs will never fully recover from this expenses scandal – not just because of what happened, but because of the way that some MPs reacted to being caught.
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 10:11 am
Ahh, but what if people don’t want you to ‘make that difference’ in their lives (I refer here to ‘you’ in general, not specifically yourself Tom)? What if through your decisions, you do things like knocking billions off the value of everyone’s pensions or consign people to a life on incapacity benefits (to pick one example from each main party)? Surely in those cases things would have been better if you hadn’t tried to ‘make that difference’. Not to be too anti-politics, but anyone who says “I want to change the world” needs to seriously ask themselves whether the world actually wants them to change it.
Who was it that said the most dangerous words in the English language are “I’m from the government and I’m here to help”?
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 10:19 am
Your chum thinks he’s got problems?! I used to work for (nationalised) British Railways – imagine having to confess that and endure the rage about the constant delays and overcrowding on the 8:03 from Purley Oaks at its like!
I hope that not too many decent people will be put off a life in politics by our increasingly frantic holier than thou media. I wonder how long, for example, Churchill might have lasted had all the details of his colourful “outside interests” been splashed daily across the tabloids and evening news bulletins in the early days of his career.
But, as Tony Blair (amongst others) has noted, for a politician to complain about the media is as futile as a sailor complaining about the weather…
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 10:22 am
I remember (well, I remember reading about) the origins of the labour party where the moneyed people of principle say the injustice being meted out to the poor.
They stood up against their own interests for the betterment of the country, for equality, civility and justice. Labout MPs should try to remember these roots and be proud of serving, while never forgetting that they are serving.
The expenses scandal is ridiculously small fry. I can’t believe how many people are so upset about it and I have to assume it is simply the straw that broke the camel’s back.
Why is it small fry? Well, compare the cost of MPs expenses compared to one Frigate or Eurofighter. Did the expenses make MPs vote in any way against the interests of their constituents? No. Democracy was not impacted by expenses and no rights were removed by them either so the outrage is misplaced.
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 10:23 am
Good on you Tom!
I have often found myself the recipient of an awkward raised-eyebrow when I tell someone that I want to go into politics. That I want to make a difference. Being proud of why you do is essential in all walks of life, and there are a lot of people who regard politicians as these thoughtless, personality-lacking ‘troughers’ as you put it, but you are all human.
My grandfather is adamant that I should reconsider; but after this expenses scandal, I have the passion to be a politician more than ever. I am very glad you enjoy what you do, I think we all should!
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 10:23 am
If I was an MP I wouldn’t tell someone I met on holiday, likewise if I was a lawyer or a doctor. You are entitled to some time off. Tell them you are in Public Relations and give yourself some time to recover.
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 10:36 am
Speaking of pride in being an MP, can you pleaase have a word with MP and Junior Minister Maria Eagle.
She said in response to Stephen Gerard’s WAG’s comments that Liverpool was rough, “Curran’s remarks won’t go down well here so perhaps she would be better off spending more of her time elsewhere.”
1. That is no way for an MP let alone a Junior Minister to speak to/about anyone.
2. She has just proved the point that it’s rough!
A better response would be, “most Liverpudlians are friendly and welcoming and I hope Ms Curran will spend more time in our lovely city discovering that fact.” As opposed to, “if she comes out here again she’ll get attacked for what she said.”
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 11:12 am
And so you should be. You presumably worked very hard to get your nomination and the support of more of your electorate that any other candidate. It would be pretty odd if you went to all that trouble, and felt ashamed about it.
However, being proud to be an MP is not the same as being proud of what you achieve once you become an MP. As has already been alluded to, there are many things about which MPs should rightly be ashamed, not least the development of a remuneration and expenses system which was evolved specifically to allow MPs to shove their snouts in the trough with a minimum of scrutiny. You may object to the term “troughers”, but I’m afraid it’s about the best word there is to describe what was going on.
Alongside that, of course, in the past twelve years we have seen a Labour government warmongering on an unprecedented scale. Are you proud of that? How about the growing gap between rich and poor. Proud of that? Falling productivity in the NHS despite record growth in funding. Falling standards in education despite increased spending. Growing unemployment. Economy in freefall. How many of those achievements do you want to declare your pride in.
You see, Tom, people don’t despise politicians because they are politicians. They despise them because they claim to have the answers, to offer a better life, and consistently, they fail to deliver. If you want respect, you have to earn it, and the reason most MPs are held in such low esteem right now is that they have lost the respect of the electorate.
Some might get it back. Most will not.
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 11:47 am
“As I’m fond of reminding interviewers, when the Houses of Parliament burned to the ground in 1834, a crowd gathered on the other side of the Thames and cheered.”
And what would happen today? The same thing, and we’d bring marshmallows to toast…
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 11:50 am
Er… that’s the point I was making, Zorro. Poiticians are incredibly unpopular, but that’s hardly a recent phenomenon.
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 12:28 pm
Tom, however, if you look at how respected politicians were at the turn of the 20th century or say, the 1950’s or practically any other decade it’s safe to say respect has gone down massively.
This generation of politicians have managed to be as respected and unpopular as when we had rotten and pocket boroughs.
Something to be proud of?
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 12:49 pm
Proud of the low esteem in which the public holds us? Of course not. Proud to be an MP? Unequivocally, yes.
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 2:50 pm
Well I am glad you are proud of being an MP as noe one else is. Your party has brought disaster to Britan like it has always done.
This post well reflects Labours attitude. Whats the weather like on your planet.
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 3:03 pm
Good post, Tom. It needs to be said that becoming an MP is still a noble and altruistic profession. However, the media (hardly whiter than white themselves) just loves to have a go at politicians (or more specifically, as far as the press is concerned, the Labour govt) and they actively encourage the general public to have a cynical and half-baked idea of what politicians are like.
Most politicians are pretty bright and motivated, and would probably have been more than capable of getting a good, well-paid job – and one without the hassle of being automatically assumed to be a scumbag.
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 3:49 pm
Are we seriously supposed to respect anything Blair had/has to say on the subject of MPs’ honesty and ‘nobility’ of purpose! He is hardly a person of integrity.
I won’t go into the numerous demonstrations that the self-proclaimed ‘I’m a pretty straight kinda guy’ was anything but, because we all now know the actualite. But on the subject of MPs’ expenses, what a suprise that most of Blair’s records were ‘accidentally’ shredded. However, from the few details which escaped ‘accidental’ destruction, we all now know he claimed substantial sums of money from the public purse for work on his house a day or so before resigning from Parliament. Nice touch that …. screw the taxpayer for every last penny before jumping ship.
Politics could be a noble calling, and it used to be. The nobles who used to make up the Lords (the hereditaries, not the appointed placeman Blair and Brown have sent there as a reward for services to Labour) served the country fairly well for centuries; as did the MPs who balanced their careers with attending Parliament until politics became a ‘full-time’ profession.
Unfortunately, since MPs have been fairly generously paid (despite what they think), the idea that being an MP is a noble calling appears to have rather gone by the board. Now large numbers seem to think their purpose is to follow the Party Line, rather than represent their Constituents. Far too many now seem to think that their allegiance is to their Party Leader, not the electorate who sent them to Westminster as THEIR representative.
But in return they expect generous salaries; excessive and unaccountable expenses to provide them with a standard of living few of their constituents can aspire to; a generous tax-payer funded pension AND respect.
Well you can’t have it all ways. If MPs want respect, they should behave in an honourable fashion. Too many haven’t (and that goes for some of the appointed ‘Lords’ as well.) If MPs want us to believe that politics is a noble calling; and politicians are honourable people they should start behaving like it.
By far the best thing that could happen would be to do away with career politicians. Cut their salaries and go back to a system where MPs have their own careers/jobs/businesses and attend Parliament on a part-time basis. Then we would get people REALLY interested in public service … instead of people who need to obtain a substantial income from the UK taxpayer and know that the best way to achieve that is to toe the party line and hope for Ministerial/Shadow advancement.
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 3:51 pm
Tom.
Your integrity shines through and I believe you want to make a difference.
Most other MPs do, too, I’m sure, at least when they’re elected.
But what is the process through which, over the years, these ideals are so clearly perverted?
And is the fall from grace inevitable?
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 4:29 pm
Oh God Tom . . . I read it! What was I thinking?
The FT (No Comment!) says that their rival newspaper got it wrong – quelle surprise!
)
I preferred the readers comments which nailed the FT to the wall.
Funny how the majority in this country don’t seem to be listening to ‘Labours facts‘ about Afghanistan, the Post Office, Bankers bonuses, 10p tax, etc.
But I expect you must be right . . . Labour have it right and the majority of the country must have it all wrong.
Perhaps it has more to do with the fact that the FT are a bit miffed that the Telegraph was able to ’stuff’ every other newspaper by breaking the MP’s Expenses Scandal (& it IS a scandal, Tom! despite what YOU say about some of your low life associates) using that good old fashioned device oft favoured by Labour to ‘test’ public reaction to policy – the LEAK. ;o)
And Tom! . . . after 12 years of abjectly corrupt government . . . what on earth would I have to be ‘bitter’ about?
)
Still only 10 months to go!
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 5:16 pm
Tom Harris said:” Proud of the low esteem in which the public holds us? Of course not. Proud to be an MP? Unequivocally, yes.”
You are splitting the two things apart. As others have said – we accept you worked hard to become an MP.
No argument.
BUT, once people become MP’s why do morals fly out the windows? People distrust MP’s not because we hate politicians without cause. It’s because frankly, you ARE untrustworthy as a group.
Until you accept this simple premise then it’s pointless to feel aggrieved. Basically, if you wish to stop being viewed as a hypocritical, troughing, self interested, anti-civil liberty parasite the best way is to stop your peers from being so (not saying you personally are … but the Commons as a whole IS).
Thus, telling people that being a politician is a noble cause is irrelevant. We judge on results not on aspirations. Probably worthwhile when compiling a manifesto (if you know what I’m saying – old bailey courts regarding same )
I wanted to discovered a cure for Cancer and Aids plus invent a Nuclear Fusion reactor. I assume my noble prize is in the post ?
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 7:07 pm
Triffid100:
Yup! That pretty much sums it up for me, too.
I think Tom is accidently (maybe deliberately) conflating what MP’s ’say’ they go into politics for . . . & . . . what they ‘actually do’ when they get there.
Any easy mistake; for a politician.
Just like ‘forgetting’ that you’ve already paid off your mortgage whilst still claiming for it.
An easy mistake that any other citizen of this country could make . . . Oh? Hang on; that’s right . . . they would end up in jail because it’s FRAUD . . . & only MP’s are allowed to get away with breaking the law.
Silly me.
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 8:20 pm
I can put it no better than Tony Blair
*************************************
Aw puh-lease, your blog your rules, but with the exception of you, Steve Pants-on-Fire, Baron Rumba, and the Alan fellow that’s always resigning, Britain’s trying to forget about **** *****, and for the most part – succeeding.
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 9:24 pm
I think you have engaged in a little cognitive dissonance. Whilst being proud to be an MP,and while I have no doubt you are a credit to your local constituents, you have slavishly followed the party line and propped up a corrupt system of anti-democracy, whereby yourselves – Parliament – has been sidelined to the status of a rather refulgent and superannuated rubber stamp.
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 11:01 pm
@ SilentHunter
perhaps, if you’re not willing to trust the FT you’d like to visit here: http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/GreenBook.pdf
Flick to page 16 and read 2.1.3.6, which is the very same rule that you claim was passed on the last day before recess.
That’s a rather impressive feat, given it was published in the Green Book in March 2009. But don’t let the facts get in the way of MP bashing…..
Wednesday 29 July 2009 at 11:30 pm
Quite a few of the comments on this post go way beyond healthy scepticism and look far more like an absurd cynicism. Perhaps some people are just jealous that Tom has managed to be elected to parliament? (Just like the left are supposedly jealous of the wealthy)
Thursday 30 July 2009 at 12:08 am
Tom: I’m a soldier, and I’m glad you’re a politician. I think you have integrity and transparency which is exactly what we need. If half your detractors on this page have put as much of themselves in harms way for our country’s good as you have I’d be surprised.
But I’d love it more if the next time Gordon comes to Afghanistan, he rides in a Viking, not a helicopter.
Thursday 30 July 2009 at 12:22 am
Oh I’m sorry, poor wee Tom, with his inflated wage and expenses
Sadly for me, I have to work for a living. Try living off minimum wage, being treated like shite and being denied trade union representation.
Try working 50 plus hours a week, with “time back” that you’ll never see
Come and live & work in the real world Mr Harrisd. You’ll never moan about your cushie life ever again
Thursday 30 July 2009 at 6:25 am
Tom
I like most of the stuff on your blog. I might not agree with much of it but I like it – really I do.
I do think here though, you’re taking a bit of a “head in the sand” approach. It’s as if you’re saying “MPs are great really, our lot is to be disliked, but it’s not our fault.”
Well I’ve got news for you – nobody else is responsible for those expenses claims. Nobody else is responsible for the insatiable desire each party has to “do the others down” at every opportunity. Nobody else is responsible for the avoidance of answering questions that EVERY MP practices. Nobody else is responsible for the fact that the things that are important to Parliamentarians are not the things that are important to the people they are supposed to represent.
I’m not saying every MP is bad. I’m not even saying that, morally at least, any political party is bad (well except the BNP of course). I am saying though, that Parliament is institutionally poor at the moment and some REAL changes need to take place to give people like me some confidence in that institutuion.
Thursday 30 July 2009 at 10:32 am
“I will never again be reluctant to advise young people in my local schools to go into politics. If you want to make that difference in people’s lives, in the life of our nation, there’s no better way — there’s no alternative, in fact — to taking a deep breath, holding your nose (if you feel you must) and taking the plunge into party politics. I will, however, advise them to avoid it unless they know they can develop a thick skin.”
I agree with your overall point but I think you over state your case a tad. People like Cicely Saunders have made a great difference to the life of our nation despite never getting involved in party politics.
I beleieve that the current crisis was caused (paradoxically enough) by MPs not being assertive enough. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again they must be paid a decent salary to do the job. My deputy head teacher at school should not have to take a pay cut to be an MP (not that I wish him to be an MP. MPs should have free 2nd class train travel anywhere in UK and free halls of residence accommodation in London.
I disagree with you Tom, about outside work. It should be a full time job. Don’t expect the people to believe that you are busy working as an MP when you have enough time to be a doctor as well.
Thursday 30 July 2009 at 12:30 pm
“Proud to be an MP? Unequivocally, yes”
Figures published by the ONS show that the poorest 5 million households are paying more in tax and receiving less in benefits than before Labour came to power.
400,000 more children are living in official poverty than four years ago (i.e. children living in households with 60% of median earnings).
The number of children in deeper poverty
(50% of median earnings) has also risen
by 400,000 higher since 2004-05.
This number has not fallen for six years
on the official benchmark.
The gap between the richest and poorest
fifths of households is greater than it was before Labour came to power.
How can you be proud of this record ?
Thursday 30 July 2009 at 12:54 pm
Simon, I’m sorry but I can’t be held responsible when people like you deliberately misunderstand what I was trying to say.
The post is in defence, not of Labour MPs, but of MPs generally. Neither was it intended as a defence of the government’s record (although I’m happy to do that on other occasions). It was intended as a defence against the constant criticisms of the ant-political (and not just the anti-Labour) classes, which try to persuade us that there is no merit in elected office.
Don’t try to tell me you didn’t get that?
Thursday 30 July 2009 at 2:38 pm
I understood your post. And the above is a reflection on all MPs, not just those who make the decisions, but those who don’t provide an effective opposition either.
Your reasons for becoming an MP may have been honourable, but if you have let down the people you were elected to represent, while still ensuring, (along with the rest of the house), that you are well looked after, through salary rises, gold plated pensions and tax free expenses, then what are you proud of exactly ?
Being proud of being elected is one thing, and your ealier posts prove how much, (rightly, in my opinion), that meant to you, but after that you surely can only judge yourself, and your party, and your fellow MPs on the results of being an MP.
Otherwise it’s surely nothing more that being proud of having the letters after your name.
Thursday 30 July 2009 at 11:08 pm
Ben:
Oh Please! . . . The Green Book which is put together by civil servants who are the servants of . . . er? . . . oh yeah! MP’s.
But I won’t let the fact that this ‘new’ expenses decision was made without any debate in parliament, go by without comment.
Or perhaps you could provide a link to the fulsome and frank debate in Parliament that I have previously missed.
)
I look forward to your next post Ben.
Friday 31 July 2009 at 4:16 am
My daughter recently had the pleasure of a wonderful event – the wedding of a friend of hers which took place in the chapel of the House of Commons. Her friend’s father is an MP.
She showed me pictures that she had taken (strickly speaking, not allowed!) of the Palace of Westminster, involking memories of the history of the place.
How priviledged must a newly elected MP feel to become part of the history of this place?
If it was me, I would be overwhelmed. I would certainly be in no mood to question my elders and betters. However, I would soon get used to that, and then I would start to think. TO THINK! I might think that I have been elected for a period of five years at most, and the reason that I have been elected is because the people who elected me want me to ensure that what the government do is fair, reasonable, necessary and for the good of the people. Anything that does not fulfil ALL these criteria is not acceptable. That is what I would think.
I believe that I might possibly just REALLY READ the legislation that the Government is proposing. I think that I would not wish for the Health Dept (in the disguise of the Chief Medical Officer) to bring in rules and regulations that I have not had the opportunity to vote on. I do not think that I would want to invade Iraq without a VERY, VERY GOOD REASON. (NB. I am not saying that the invasion of Iraq was wrong – I do not know.) And so on.
The idea that the Gov might use spin, tricks and dodgy statistics to try to convince the people that a particular course of action is correct would fill me with horror!
I WOULD NOT HAVE IT! I would make my statement – I would say, in public, I do not agree!
But would I? I have just bought a flat in London. the taxpayer is paying my mortgage interest. I only have to wait a while and the flat will increase in value. Why rock the boat? And so I do not do what I should. I capitulate and I waffle, and I claim maximum expenses – I have been corrupted!
There is much more that I could say – about the hunting ban, the smoking ban, global warming, family courts,etc – but I have gone on long enough.
Leave a comment