EVERY August, MPs have to start thinking about Christmas cards.
The Speaker sends out an order form to each MP, containing two or three designs of cards and details of costs. Most years I’ve chosen a design from the Speaker’s selection; a few years ago I designed my own, using a picture I took of Big Ben and the Speaker’s Christmas tree. And last year, for the first time, I ran a Christmas card competition in one of my local schools.
But this year I’m returning to the “official” card. These are the three designs that have been shortlisted this year. Any thoughts on which one I should go for?



Oh, and to save you the time of complaining about MPs “using tax-payers’ money to buy political propaganda while everyone else has to buy their own Christmas cards, etc…”, let me be clear: I have never claimed the cost of parliamentary cards on my expenses, mainly because you can’t, not even on the communications allowance. So stick to the art criticism.
And no, the message inside won’t read “Season’s Greetings” or “Happy Holidays” or any other neutral, vanilla nonsense; it will read “Merry Christmas”.
























Sunday 9 August 2009 at 2:57 pm
Speaking as an Atheist Muslim of Jewish ancestry with Hindu and Sikh friends, I am SO offended at this!
Sunday 9 August 2009 at 3:28 pm
I think there is an aspect of Christmas cards that people sometimes forget, and that is they are often not just an envelope you hand over to the recipient, but that the cards will be decorating a room for several weeks at a time.
We buy what we would like, but rarely think what the recipient would prefer – which is odd as we wouldn’t do that for any other gift we offer.
With that in mind, from a purely aesthetic point of view, the middle option is the one I would most like to see sitting on my TV over the Xmas period (I don’t have a mantelpiece).
The top one is not bad, but a bit I dunno, looking like it came from the V&A tourist shop?, whilst the bottom one looks exactly what it is – a child’s drawing. A good drawing, but not what I want sitting on top of Jon Snow’s head when I am watching the Ch4 news.
Sunday 9 August 2009 at 3:30 pm
Second one. Mainly because I have no idea what the hell the first one is meant to be of, and yes, it is lovely to have children designing cute little christmas cards, but I can’t push it out of my mind the fact that I think the third one looks bloody aweful.
Plus the second one looks quite nice.
Sunday 9 August 2009 at 3:36 pm
I like the first one. Very Pugin-esque.
Sunday 9 August 2009 at 4:22 pm
No contest … the first one
Sunday 9 August 2009 at 5:54 pm
I wouldn’t pick any of them. I still believe that Christmas is a religious festival and would find an appropriate card with a Christmas religious theme, probably a painting by some well known artist from the past. I fail to see why anyone should object or take offence; I am inviting the recipient to celebrate the occasion, whether they wish to do so is up to them.
Sunday 9 August 2009 at 6:12 pm
The 1st One.
I prefer something in the spirit of the season when celebrating Christmas
Sunday 9 August 2009 at 6:40 pm
The 3rd one.
After all, poor Lucy will be paying off our government debt all her life, she might as well have her card design chosen.
Did anyone else notice Brewster’s Millions being shown on Channel 4 earlier (ref to an Iain Martin column some time back)?
Sunday 9 August 2009 at 6:41 pm
i am surprised in the world of political correctness you are allowed to celebrate christmas as mp’s…surely there must be someone out there you will offend!
by the way…this a bit of humour before anyone takes it too seriously
Sunday 9 August 2009 at 7:59 pm
The second one, without question.
The first is, to put it bluntly, boring – as well as not being particularly Christmassy. The third is cute but, as IanVisits says, not one for sitting on the top of the TV.
The second card evokes feelings of Christmas spirit, and shows the majesty of the Palace of Westminster in the snow. Beautiful.
Sunday 9 August 2009 at 8:41 pm
[...] as it seems that minds at Westminster are now being concentrated on another important matter, as Tom Harris discusses. Yup, it’s time for Parliamentarians to get their Christmas cards [...]
Sunday 9 August 2009 at 8:41 pm
Top one – too chopped off.
Second one – too boring.
Third one – sorry.
A much better choice at Oxfam, and for a good cause.
Sunday 9 August 2009 at 8:53 pm
None of them. The first too are incredibly boring and the third is cute but not what I would want to get from my MP. Not that you are, or that mine knows me. Get your pics out and choose something better.
Sunday 9 August 2009 at 11:44 pm
Go for the third one. The second has no relevance to Christmas.
As long as you send one to me. I’ll send one to you I promise.
Monday 10 August 2009 at 8:24 am
Being a traditionalist I think the Angel is just so beutiful, and reflects this Christian festival very well. The other 2 well the St Stephens tower is familier to most, we have all had our children do similars scenes of the third. ButI have never seen this angel before and I suspect most have not and that is why I would choose it.
Monday 10 August 2009 at 11:05 am
First one imo is horrible! and third not that good – sorry
2nd one catches the winter feeling with the snow, looks good, and it being what it is has relevance to you as an MP.
Monday 10 August 2009 at 1:48 pm
For those who can’t work it out, the first one clearly depicts the virgin birth, with Mary’s modesty protected by an Angel holding up a blanket.
Monday 10 August 2009 at 5:07 pm
Do the decent thing and buy a UK charity card.
Monday 10 August 2009 at 5:11 pm
I intend to at the earliest opportunity
Wednesday 12 August 2009 at 1:51 am
I think the third one, purely because the other two looked ghastly.
Leave a comment