PITY poor Nick Clegg.
He is, first of all, leader of the LibDems. Also, he’s been finding it hard to attract any publicity. He is, after all, the only one of the three main party leaders with absolutely no chance whatever of being Prime Minister. Ever.
So that rather limits your options when it comes to seizing the agenda. In the summer he pretended that he wanted parliament to cancel its recess in order to get MPs’ expenses sorted out. He had a moderate hit with that one, so he’s tried the same thing again, by “demanding” (bless) that the Queen’s Speech is cancelled and that we spent the next six months wringing our hands in anguish (but he doesn’t want us to mention MEPs’ expenses scams, for some odd reason).
Yeah, we know that very little of the next legislative programme will make it onto the statute books before the general election, Mick – we read newspapers when we were at school as well; we know how the constitution works. Just get back in your box and concentrate on what LibDems do best: complaining about dog crap on the pavement then doing sod all about it.
And if you don’t feel like making conversation with a parliamentary under-secretary of state during the walk from the Commons to the Lords on Wednesday while Brown and Cameron discuss grown-up stuff at the front of the procession, why not just stay at home and write whateer you intend to say next time you appear on “Thought for the Day”?














Monday 16 November 2009 at 9:32 am
Brilliant!
The only thing the Liberal Democrats stand for is election.
Monday 16 November 2009 at 9:32 am
He’d be able to make the political running if he suggested withdrawing of Afghanistan.
But Lord Ashdown would never let him. He’s afraid of Lord Ashdown. Lord Ashdown can kill a man with a special look.
Monday 16 November 2009 at 9:40 am
“Yeah, we know that very little of the next legislative programme will make it onto the statute books before the general election, Mick”
Shurely shome mishtake?
Is the inability to spell names correctly a prerequisite of Labour Party membership?
I ask merely for information. . .
D
Monday 16 November 2009 at 9:53 am
Gaston!
A saucer of milk for table six, please!
Monday 16 November 2009 at 10:09 am
perhaps you might read this and start a debate on the lib dem manual on how to use expenses for political activity.
http://bristolwestpaul.wordpress.com/2009/10/11/born-slippy/
Monday 16 November 2009 at 10:09 am
The irony is that every time Clegg has a ‘thought of the day’, you write some variation of this blog post.
Monday 16 November 2009 at 10:10 am
He’s a moderate Tory, with a tory wife, trying to be i/c a party i/f free mood altering drugs . . .
No policies please, we’re the third party (or sixth, wasn’t it in Glasgae North East?)
His antennae work when it comes to daft proposals trying to outdo Chameleon in bashing the Parliament we vote for . .
Elect the Lords.
Monday 16 November 2009 at 10:30 am
Tom have a care he must be still trying to get over the shock of their result in Glasgow. People when they have had a deep shock like this do say silly things.
It may take several months for him to get over it, if he ever does.
Monday 16 November 2009 at 10:59 am
Tom: “…very little of the next legislative programme will make it onto the statute books”
Could you please enlighten me, Tom. How much of the legislative programme tends to be new laws and legislation and how much is BAU governmental business?
Monday 16 November 2009 at 11:00 am
As a second point, could you tell me how many laws the labour government have removed from the statute books in their 12 years in power? Or even some of the big ones if you can’t get a rough figure.
Cheers.
Monday 16 November 2009 at 11:04 am
Sure, Paul – after all, I’m just a research facility for internet users, aren’t I?
Monday 16 November 2009 at 11:07 am
“very little of the next legislative programme will make it onto the statute books”
So why is Gordon going through the motions of ‘governing’ the country then. Is it because the Labour Party is broke and can’t afford to fund an election campaign, so instead he intends using the Queen, Government and Parliamentary processes to run a campaign.
Civil Servants are (supposed to be) impartial. I hope all Civil Servants, asked to work on matters and ‘prospective legislation’ which are obviously party political and will never pass into law, refuse to do so.
Monday 16 November 2009 at 11:22 am
Don’t be silly.
Monday 16 November 2009 at 11:25 am
Dear Brenda,
I appreciate that this is rather short notice, but can I request that you stay at home on Wednesday as your attendance is not required (you could watch Odd Man Out on BBC 2 instead; I gather it’s rather good).
It’s not like we don’t want you, and I understand that it will cause a constitution crisis, besides overturning hundreds of years of tradition, but I need some good newspaper headlines because I’m not very popular, you see?
Cheers
Cleggy
P.S. Do you like my new haircut?
Monday 16 November 2009 at 12:04 pm
I just figured you might as well do something useful. You were a member of the government, have been in Parliament for a while, I thought I’d ask someone who knew rather then just make it up like some people commenting tend to do. You may have enlightened some people at the same time.
Still, if you’d rather think I was trying to have a go at the goverment then so be it.
Even though I’m at work, paying taxes to keep you guys in duck houses and you’re too busy to answer an honest question
Monday 16 November 2009 at 12:14 pm
Tom. Regarding the impossibility of Clegg ever, ever becoming prime minister.
Well, now. In my screen play I’d visualise a merger between Lib Dems and a left-leaning Labour party after a period of Tory rule.
The Blairites then split to form a smaller party.
Brown has long gone, and the most acceptable alternative leaders having left with the Blairites, we’re down to Clegg as the most suitable candidate with leadership experience.
He wins an internal contest, with
Jon Cruddas as deputy.
The country soon tires of the Tories, and votes in the new Lib-Lab party.
Okay, I haven’t started writing it yet!
Monday 16 November 2009 at 1:33 pm
“Well, now. In my screen play I’d visualise a merger between Lib Dems and a left-leaning Labour party after a period of Tory rule.”
But Clegg has moved lib dems to the right on economic issues, look at his opposition to 50% tax band. In Bristol the Lib Dems are involved in closing services in poor areas to increase them in richer areas. They are not of the left, things like tuition fees was just niche marketing not policy.
Monday 16 November 2009 at 1:42 pm
Don’t be patronising.
I think my comment is correct. Brown is using taxpayers, our Head of State and our impartial Civil Service to facilitate an election campaign Labour can’t afford.
Monday 16 November 2009 at 3:30 pm
@Paul Smith
“…But Clegg has moved lib dems to the right on economic issues…”
Correct…in part. But look at Vince Cable. Not a right winger as the Tories would recognise one. And on many social issues, they line up very neatly with the Labour left.
It’s all about positioning. And in the hopeless political world of Proportional Representation, so beloved by Lib Dems, and what they would try so hard to bring about,positioning is everything. To be kind, they’re, er, flexible.
Monday 16 November 2009 at 9:27 pm
Liberanos:
If you Ever voted Labour it had something to do with a Blair fixation Try to Understand before you comment – New Start!!
Paul:
Will you be asking your dentist re your awful diet?
QuietzappleADV £25 PM
Tuesday 17 November 2009 at 8:52 am
Tom, I detect the hand of Famous Grouse or Johnnie Walker here. The evidence? Two typos (by my count) which is unusually careless of you AND a bitch-slap so hard that Clegg will have a palm-shaped bruise on his face for the rest of the week. Which is also unlike you. Do you deny it?
Tuesday 17 November 2009 at 9:40 am
Okay, I spelled “whatever” wrongly in the last sentence. What’s the other typo?
Tuesday 17 November 2009 at 11:13 am
@Quietzapple
“…If you Ever voted Labour it had something to do with a Blair fixation Try to Understand before you comment – New Start!!….”
Not a complete argument I fear, and possibly a little impolite.
Tuesday 17 November 2009 at 1:11 pm
@Liberanos “and possibly a little impolite”
Quietzapple seems to get away with a lot.
When I saw the subject, I was hoping Tom was talking about him, but alas no.
Wednesday 18 November 2009 at 4:56 pm
Calling him Mick.
Come on, Tom. Admit it – one or two sherries too many and out came the clunking fist!
Wednesday 18 November 2009 at 5:12 pm
Oh, get with the programme, George… http://www.tomharris.org.uk/2009/09/17/cleggs-hey-everybody-look-at-me-moment/
Leave a comment