RONNIE, who started his primary education this year, will be appearing in his class’s nativity play soon.
He will not be playing Joseph. “Good!” said I to his mother. “Rubbish part. The best part is the innkeeper.”
“How so, oh wise husband of mine?” said Carolyn (okay, that’s not exactly what she said, but you get my drift).
So why does the innkeeper play such an important part in the whole First Christmas broo-haha?
Well, remember that part where the Imperial Star Destoyer captures the rebel blockade runner in its tractor beam at the very start of Episode IV? And then the droids escaped to the surface of Tatooine with the Death Star tapes in the escape pod? Well, remember the Imperial gunner who almost shoots the pod down? And then he doesn’t because “there are no life forms on board”?
Well that bloke is recognised among theologians Star Wars fans everywhere as the most crucial, pivotal character in the whole original trilogy. If he had followed his orignal instinct and blown the escape pod to bits, then the droids wouldn’t have made it to Tatooine or into the ownership of Luke Skywalker. Obi-Wan would have stayed in retirement, Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru wouldn’t have been slaughtered by storm troopers and Princess Leia’s execution aboard the Death Star would have gone ahead as scheduled. The Death Star’s fatal weakness would not have been uncovered and would not have been destroyed, so, eventually, would have destroyed the Rebel Alliance.
All because that gunner opened fire on the escape pod. Which he didn’t.
“Are you drunk?”
So, anyway, back to Bethlehem 2000 years ago. The innkeeper could easily have gone that extra mile for his last-minute customers, Mary and Joseph. He could have found a room somewhere. Or he could have sent them packing with a warning not to use his stable or else he’ll get the centurions onto them. Where would the Nativity have been then?
Shepherds are rarely allowed into hotel lobbies, for a start. The Wise Men (the number of whom is not specified in Scripture) would have been hard pressed to track down the actual room number. So no Frankincense, gold or myrrh – and no tradition of prezzies at this time of year!!
Theologically speaking, the Lord being born in a manger provided a powerful message about the humility of His beginnings; a Travelodge doesn’t quite have the same impact.
So, to sum up: the innkeeper’s the part you want to go for, son.
“He’s playing a king,” said Carolyn. “And I fell asleep during Star Wars.”
Right.















Friday 4 December 2009 at 7:16 pm
I think I preferred Mr Spoon’s take on it all. More drama, simpler story line, and button moon too.
Friday 4 December 2009 at 7:32 pm
I also played a King but about fifty five years ago. “I bring myrrh” was my line. Being a well brought up child who knew his place and who calmly accepted all life’s peculiarities, it never occurred to me to ask what myrrh was.
Whose doll is to play the baby cheese us? That seems to figure highly most years in the Xmas term’s discussions at the school where my wife plays such an active role in the tivertee…
Friday 4 December 2009 at 7:41 pm
[...] This post was Twitted by KerronCross [...]
Friday 4 December 2009 at 8:23 pm
FADE IN
INTERIOR: IMPERIAL STARDESTROYER.
On the main viewscreen, the lifepod carrying the two terrified robots speeds away from the stricken Rebel spacecraft.
CHIEF PILOT: There goes another one.
CAPTAIN: Hold your fire. There are no life forms. It must have been
short-circuited.
A fiery explosion fills the viewscreen.
CHIEF PILOT: Erm… did you say ‘open fire’ or ‘hold your fire’?
CAPTAIN: Whatever.
FADE OUT
ROLL CREDITS OVER STARS
THE END
Friday 4 December 2009 at 10:11 pm
Very funny Tom
@ Brian – baby cheese us would have to be played by Yoda in this parallel existence surely?
A green cheese us of course…
Friday 4 December 2009 at 10:36 pm
Have you been watching the re-run of Spaced?
Friday 4 December 2009 at 11:04 pm
Nativity play? Not very inclusive is it, in this multicultural society we live in. Make sure you have your Criminal Records Declaration is up do date, and remember, taking photographs inside the school is forbidden in case paedophiles get hold of them, and they are forbidden outside under section 44 of the prevention of terrorism act. Make sure you bring your ID and proof of parenthood. Of course, under EU rules, the use of hay or other straw products must be banned for health and safety reasons. Candles are right out. The use of tea towels for headwear is merely pandering to racist stereotypes and the whole thing does not, I feel, have a pro-Palestinian ethos. I do however, approve of the singing of “A Wain in a Manger” as long as it is made clear that social services will be visiting to ask why a baby is being housed with farm animals.
Happy New Labour Winterval.
Friday 4 December 2009 at 11:10 pm
As a former Nativity Innkeeper (“But what about the stable?”) I can confirm its role as cultural pivot. I saw myself more as Uncle Owen…
Friday 4 December 2009 at 11:23 pm
I think that is a most insulting blog to Christians and should be removed.Mocking the Holy Nativity is just not needed.
Saturday 5 December 2009 at 12:10 am
I played the part of Joseph whilst in my final year of primary (the first and last years of the school did separate nativities) in a tiny village in most rural Ireland. Hicksville did not take kindly to an outsider (being a Scot myself) playing a leading role in the play. Doing it in a Jackie Mason voice – as my lines were straight out of the “Stereotypes Series – Jewish Man” book – added class to the role that I doubt has been seen before or since at primary school Nativities!
Saturday 5 December 2009 at 12:13 am
It is somewhat tasteless, Johnny, as are some of the comments. You should have known better, Tom.
Saturday 5 December 2009 at 12:27 am
Sighs heavily. Exits, stage left.
Saturday 5 December 2009 at 1:04 am
heh, thank you Tom it made me laugh which is in short supply for me at the moment
My daughter was furious last Christmas when she was a sheep but I pointed out that sheep were the first visitors!
We may be politically different but defintely geeks unite!
May I highjack your blog to push FAST?
Thanks
Saturday 5 December 2009 at 7:30 am
You should not remove it Tom and I revise my comment for that only. I believe in free speech more than anything.
You can learn so much from it, as in this case, that puts you Tom on the margins of a civil society. Why are so manny Labour people so rude to others that do not share their views on life.Why does labour never show respect to others that have a different view. Its so narrow and the reason we are in such a mess.
Saturday 5 December 2009 at 8:42 am
I got stuck with being the sheep most years, but my son is playing Darth Harrington, of “Darth Harrington’s Intergalactic Proton Powered Electrical Tentacled Advertising Droids Emporium and Moon Base” – who is also a pretty pivotal character in the whole Star Wars saga.
Saturday 5 December 2009 at 8:42 am
@Wrinkled Weasel – what about the RSPCA, have you no thought for the poor animals!
And I wouldn’t go defending the singing of A Wain in a Manger, or you’ll bring down the wrath of God in the form of the Bishop of Croydon!
Saturday 5 December 2009 at 9:02 am
‘Well, remember that part where the Imperial Star Destoyer captures the rebel blockade runner in its tractor beam at the very start of Episode IV? And then the droids escaped to the surface of Tatooine with the Death Star tapes in the escape pod? Well, remember the Imperial gunner who almost shoots the pod down? And then he doesn’t because “there are no life forms on board”?’
Goodness no I don’t remember! My life is obviously lacking something.
As for who plays the baby ‘cheese us’, well surely it has to be Bree.
Saturday 5 December 2009 at 10:21 am
I agree with Stewart, how dare you conflate fact (Star Wars) with fiction (Nativity).
Apart from being a nice story about humble origins (as is the whole Jewish religion and culture) do you know what evidence there is for it? None, zero, zilch, nada. Heck, Jesus’ supposed birth occurred long after Herod the baby killer had died.
Does anyone else think it is stupid to worship a baby? Happy Christmas everyone.
Saturday 5 December 2009 at 11:00 am
The 3D version of “A Christmas Carol” is gobsmackingly gobsmacking! The 3D snow seems colder . . .
Unsure it is suitable for children, but then they like to be scared.
I found it very moving, and amusing: it is one of Dickens masterworks imho.
Saturday 5 December 2009 at 11:22 am
never ceases to amaze me that so many of your avid readers seem to hate you so much.
do you think it’s somehow cathartic for them to rant on?
makes their own pathetic lives somehow seem less pointless?
or have they become parodies of themselves and passed through the point of insult and arrived at humour?
Thought not.
Saturday 5 December 2009 at 11:23 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDKiQfBs9lo
Saturday 5 December 2009 at 11:27 am
@ Johnny Norfolk
“…Mocking the Holy Nativity is just not needed…”
Indeed.
No mockery could possibly do justice to the original.
Saturday 5 December 2009 at 11:33 am
Brilliant! I am a huge fan (and also a Jedi – so watch out for mind tricks).
I was on the phone to my brother yesterday and I spoke to my little nephew. I asked him if there was a nativity play, he has two sisters in the same school, and he said there was a play, and that he was a Dalek, and his sisters had parts in the same play as an Angel, and Rudolf. Sounds like one helluva nativity play to me!
There could be three wise Jedi’s following the reindeer in the east and arriving in a tardis with light sabres, sonic screwdrivers and frankincense.
Saturday 5 December 2009 at 12:56 pm
OK people, step back from the keyboards, take a deep breath. I’m sure Tom, a committed Christian from all accounts meant nothing by it at all;
If he did, I’m sure the likes of GadgetVicar would be happy to take him to task.
In the mean time, I have a fairly simple metric; if he doesn’t offend me with his baby-jesus naivity play’s and “jesus is the reason for the season” malarky, I won’t come in and start claiming that Yule is really the festival most of us follow, the trees, the drinking the lights and the feasting etc. and start arguing for a return of Scotland to a pagan state…
It’s called religious tolerance. We don’t have to like what you believe. We just have to let you do so.
So a happy forthcoming Yule to those who follow the Old Ways, and a Merry Christmas to those who don’t.
Saturday 5 December 2009 at 6:53 pm
A nice little anecdote about how both the Nativity and Star Wars both have one seemingly minor (but actually very crucial) character. How astonishing that it becomes a springboard for a Daily Mail distopia Winterval fantasy and accusations of blasphemy!
I expect Ronnie will make an extremely cute King.
That’s the real purpose of Nativity plays – to OD on cuteness. Actually, over-familiarity with the story tends to make us overlook how squalid giving birth in a stable would be – which is sort of the point of the story of Jesus’s birth, poverty and oppression and all that.
Saturday 5 December 2009 at 10:31 pm
@Nicky: Many have given birth in fields, it is the classic tale for those who plant rice etc.
Surely the stable, to a woman no doubt extremely healthy by today’s standards (she survived to a relatively advanced age, and she could bear her firstborn to term) was simply a shelter, and any would be better than the cold outdoors, with the winds and the greater problems of keeping Jesus warm?
Relating the Birth of our Lord to the births of all we creatures surely grounds him parallel to our lives, shows that He is ours, given to us.
Unsure the usual songs convey that.
Sunday 6 December 2009 at 1:45 am
Shouldn’t atheists and agnostics simply mind their own business?
Sunday 6 December 2009 at 2:38 am
My children are in a Nativity play. My God son is in a Nativity play. Your children are in a Nativity play. The school at which I am a Governor has a Nativity play. Why then do we still have to read abouot / listen to people going on and on about Nativity Plays are not allowed any more. It is Political Correctness Gone Mad. It is all the fault of Muslims / Brown / Blair…
Sunday 6 December 2009 at 9:57 am
And since we are on the Christmas scene, here’s to the BBC 1’s Doctor Who christmas idents this year!
Oh and those having a go about Tom’s post – try being Christian for a change!
Sunday 6 December 2009 at 10:01 am
Because, Cathy, they lie tendentiously, hoping for a Tory/BNP/UKIP government to restore their illusions of what life was like in the ’50s.
The amusing thing is that they cry “Freedom!” and hope to close down alternatives to their own view.
Happy Christmas!
Sunday 6 December 2009 at 10:21 am
@ Quietzapple: I agree! (both your last posts)
Regarding photography at Nativity and Christmas plays, it seems to vary from school to school. Last year at one I went to there was a sort of sea of parents holding up digital cameras to record the happy scene. There doesn’t seem to be any “NuLab” conspiracy to stop them doing so.
Sunday 6 December 2009 at 10:42 am
Something that seems incongruous with His so-called humble beginnings is the gifts the three wise men (astrologers seem somewhat at odds with “do not suffer a witch to live”, anyhoo) brought surely made them pretty rich. With the gold frankincense and mhyrr they could have bought the inn and sent the innkeeper packing. And if the value of the gifts was not significant then traveling thousands of miles to pay your respects with tat seems stupid.
Just another Biblical contradiction that Christians seem more than happy to ignore.
Sunday 6 December 2009 at 12:37 pm
‘And Jesus is a bit like that Death Star exploding…’
Kudos for the inappropriate pairing of an Imperial cruiser with a Xmas greeting. Positively Adamsian.
And Quietzapple, lay off the paranoia about ‘they’ for this thread at least? What you posted wasn’t even relevant to Cathy’s message.
Sunday 6 December 2009 at 1:55 pm
@Paul 10.21 & 10.42 – you haven’t really got the hang of this Christianity thing, have you?
Sunday 6 December 2009 at 2:15 pm
Quite brilliant – you’re quite right, of course (as was Wrinkled Weasel, btw!), and the theology of Star Wars is quite amazing.
Sunday 6 December 2009 at 2:23 pm
@Paul
Honestly, pointing out the obvious absurdities in an iron age book of magic
is like saying you disliked Hitler because of his shoes.
Religious belief is simply a mild mental illness related to terror of mortality, and open to so much ridicule there’s no point in taking it apart.
Monday 7 December 2009 at 12:12 pm
Tom, you make an interesting point regarding the Star Wars character, but it fails in the Jesus tale. The idea that being born in an inn room is much worse that a stable is a bit much – the rooms didn’t have much in the way of creature comforts – a straw bed at best (which is what they ended up with anyway). As for the three wise men not finding the right room – how many rooms do you think there are in a 2,000 year old in? And would it take much wisdom, having travelled for thousands(?) of miles to maybe listen out for a screaming woman or crying infant? Or knock the front door and ask the innkeeper which room the pregnant woman is in.
On that note, is it really surprising the innkeeper turned them away? Who wants to be cleaning up after a birth? How long would it take before he could rent out that room again?
And who shows up at Christmas* without booking ahead expecting a room? Bad planning by Joseph.
* Okay, not Christmas, but given there was a census on there were going to be loads of people going that way so he should have booked ahead. Online maybe.
Monday 7 December 2009 at 2:17 pm
@Paul “maybe listen out for a screaming woman or crying infant”
Unfortunately, the time-lines in the nativity story are a little blurred.
Herod ordered the deaths of all children under 2, (rather than new-borns) when he heard from the wise-men about a new “king” being born, so the chances are, they arrived some time after the birth of Jesus, (by which time Mary and Joseph would not have been at Bethleham anymore, since they only travelled there for a census).
Monday 7 December 2009 at 3:47 pm
@Paul “maybe listen out for a screaming woman or crying infant”
On second thoughts….
The Gospels of Matthew and Luke have conflicting stories about the birth of Jesus, but according to Away In A Manger, the baby Jesus didn’t cry, so if they did rely on listenng out for a screaming infant, they’d have lucked out.
Tuesday 8 December 2009 at 9:41 am
Simon: ‘The Gospels of Matthew and Luke have conflicting stories about the birth of Jesus, but according to Away In A Manger, the baby Jesus didn’t cry, so if they did rely on listenng out for a screaming infant, they’d have lucked out.’
On a pedantic note, ‘lucked out’ means to have got lucky, not to be ‘out of luck’.
I’ll just get me coat…
Tuesday 8 December 2009 at 9:49 am
Nertz, after a moment of self-doubt, I Googled the phrase, and Wiki says it can mean either. How vexing.
Tuesday 8 December 2009 at 10:28 am
@Bridie, “On a pedantic note, ‘lucked out’ means to have got lucky, not to be ‘out of luck’. ”
I stand corrected
Leave a comment