AMERICA prides itself on having a society where it’s claimed “anyone can become president.” In Scotland, since 2007, our motto has been: “Anyone just did become a minister”.
Not for nothing is environment minister Roseanna Cunningham known as “Republican Rose”. She decided, some time ago, to reject Home Office advice that for security reasons, two public paths through the Balmoral Estate should not be publicised. “Based on the information currently available to me, I am therefore minded to proceed on the basis that these two paths should be included in the adopted Cairngorms National Park Authority core path plan,” she wrote in response to the Home Office advice.
Fortunately, Home Office minister David Hanson wasn’t prepared to play fast and loose with HM’s safety and warned Ché Cunningham that he would over-rule her on national security grounds if she didn’t cave. Her whacky plans constituted “a security risk to the Queen and her immediate family,” he told her.
She duly caved.
What kind of person allows her own republican principles to reject security advice as it affects the Royal Family? What a shocking way for any minister – and even at Holyrood they are Her Majesty’s ministers, whether you like it or not – to behave.
Inevitably, Big Eck’s response at First Minister’s Questions was to shout and smirk a lot. Oh, and launch an investigation into the leak that resulted in the Daily Record scoop. Fair enough. A leak inquiry is exactly what an administration formed by any other party would do. But no-one does defensive shouting and arrogant smirking quite like Alex.
The irony, of course, is that Republican Rose is the reason Alex is where he is. In 2004, following John Swinney’s resignation as SNP leader, Alex gave an undertaking that under no circumstances would he consider returning to lead his party. Then the reality sunk in that his preferred candidate, Nicola Sturgeon, would be thumped in a head-to-head contest with Roseanna. So he was persuaded to throw his hat into the ring, standing on a ticket with Nicola as his deputy.
Blind loyalty to a ministerial colleague aside, I doubt if he would shed any tears if Roseanna ended up falling on her sword over this latest SNP farce.
























Friday 9 October 2009 at 11:18 am
@ Iain Gill.
Once again I would like to express my wholehearted support for Scottish independence.
So long alex. Thanks for the oil.
Friday 9 October 2009 at 12:14 pm
Alec if you try and think about this rationally you will realise that Alex Salmond has absolutely no interest in the politics of England and no desire to muscle in on a debate between the two potential Prime Ministers of England. But this debate is being punted as a “leaders debate”. As the leader of the most popular party in Scotland he has an interest in what is broadcast in Scotland.
Re your final point. Unless you think that the Tories are on course to win a majority of Westminster seats in Scotland – and you would be the only person on Planet Earth who does think that – then you must acknowledge that the political landscapes in Scotland and England are fundamentally different.
Friday 9 October 2009 at 3:32 pm
you Beat me to it Tom…..Oh and you missed out the bit whereby the ‘drug dealer’ leaned out of his window and lit his spliff with £50 notes
“human rights act” where are these people coming from
Friday 9 October 2009 at 3:52 pm
Sorry Tom, I’ve promised to only tell Andrew Marr about any gossip I hear so he can air it on the BBC.
Palin 2012
Friday 9 October 2009 at 4:11 pm
nobody ever tells us MPs anything.
Perhaps you should get out more from the Westminster Village.
Word on the street has it that your party are ‘out’ come the General Election.
Remember Tom, you heard it here, first.
Friday 9 October 2009 at 4:15 pm
Nicky:
LOL
I see Sammy beat me to the most obvious retort.
But how about the abolition of the 10p tax rate?
That was Labour wasn’t it. 6 million of the lowest paid having their tax DOUBLED in one go.
Game, set and General Election, I think.
Friday 9 October 2009 at 4:39 pm
I do hope the next ‘term’ in Westminster will turn out to be the last for a very large number of your colleagues – in fact every one of them who voted against the Referendum on the LisbonConTreaty which they promised in the Labour Party Manifesto.
(I couldn’t possibly disappoint you by not mentioning it!)
Friday 9 October 2009 at 4:41 pm
Tom, you are normally a decent chap, and entertaining to read.
This however has made me delete you from my RSS, I don’t expect you to care, just wanted you to know.
Your articles are sometimes decent and thoughtful, and I especially enjoyed the ones about you first few days as an MP. But this on top of all the daft partisan posts really gets under my skin. And I beleve is most of the reason people don’t pay attention any more.
Thursday 21 January 2010 at 4:34 pm
If these paths are such security risks, why are they public in the first place? Preventing them from being shown on maps isn’t worth much if people are allowed on them anyway.
Thursday 21 January 2010 at 5:15 pm
As a matter of interest I googled Glen Muick (one of the paths – the one I know) to see how well publicised it already is and guess what I found?
http://www.balmoralcastle.com/balmoral_walks.htm
“Friday 11th December – Visit the Arctic Inhabitants on International Mountain Day.
Join the rangers in search of Ptarmigan and Mountain Hare high up on Balmoral Estate as they prepare for winter.
Meeting point: Glen Muick Visitor Centre
Time: 9.30 a.m. until 3.30 p.m.
Cost: £5.00 per person”
Booking essential – 013397 55059
The figgin Scottish tourist Board advertise the walk!!!
Perhaps you should report them to the police as jeapardising royal security?
Thursday 21 January 2010 at 5:31 pm
She’s Australian. She’s Catholic. She’s agin the ‘English’ monarchy.
She is Mel Gibson female.
Thursday 21 January 2010 at 5:43 pm
Sorry to keep harping on about this but here is some more interesting reading:
http://www.balmoralcastle.com/balmoral_public_access.htm
“Public Access
Visitor monitoring devices are deployed at all the main access points to the estate. The devices show us that approximately 160,000 walkers visit the Lochnagar and Loch Muick area of the Estate annually. The Estate maintains a network of about 240 kilometers of roads, tracks and paths. With the assistance of Scottish Natural Heritage and the Upper Deeside Access Trust, almost £1,000,000 has been invested in footpath repairs over the last ten years.
A full time Ranger service has been provided for over 35 years, together with a car park and visitor centre at Spittal of Muick. The visitor centre is open 365 days/year.”
And yet …… despite the 160,000 visitors, the 240 kilometers of roads, tracks and paths maintained to allow public access and the full time Ranger service the Cairngorm National Park Authority are not allowed to put paths in Balmoral in their plan because it would endanger the Royal Family.
Thursday 21 January 2010 at 5:52 pm
You should stand as an MSP Tom, and sort them all out instead of hurling invective from afar
Thursday 21 January 2010 at 6:11 pm
Plenty of the same spirit is alive and well in the British Government.
Thursday 21 January 2010 at 7:07 pm
Always wondered why he returned. At the time Nicola had won he haw in a straight first past the post election. Instead she hung on to dear life in Govan to the list system. I would find it unacceptable that someone who never won a seat could be considered for any leadership post. I always thought Roseanne was a spent force. Literally. Are you sure her decision was motivated by republican thoughts? I just thought she was thick.
Thursday 21 January 2010 at 8:39 pm
Hate to keep harpring on a theme but the other top secret location the Cairngorm National Park Authority are not allowed to put on their map is Ballochbuie.
I would not wish to endanger any royals by discussing the matter any further. You can however get very detailed instructions on how to get there from the Forestry Commission. And the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (it’s an SAC site).
Shocking how far these republicam tendrils extend isn’t it?
Friday 22 January 2010 at 4:53 pm
What a non story YAWN!!!!
Good god,theres even a bothy next to Charlie and Camillas hideyhole,in fact Charlie has been known on the odd occasion to pop in and share a wee dram with visitors to the bothy, security risk my ****.
Monday 25 January 2010 at 11:55 am
No doubt this story is enough to elevate the dander of your Tory/New Labour readers, but the royal family doesn’t enjoy quite the same level of blind loyalty among the hoi poloi of Scotland.
Your in-house comic the Daily Retard notwithstanding, even the hostile Scottish media are not feigning outrage at the brand new and astonishing revelation that Roseanna C. is something of a republican.
Leave a comment