ODDLY, the most recent General Election is the one of which I have fewest recollections.
The whole campaign, from what I recall, plodded along rather predictably. The only visual “moment” from the national campaign I can think of was of Tony Blair giving Gordon an ice cream cone. Hardly the Prescott punch or Sharron Storer moment.
In Glasgow, I was fighting for the new seat of Glasgow South, Cathcart having been consigned to history by the recent boundary review (although the Holyrood seat retains the name). There was a good, rather than excited, atmosphere in the campaign rooms – a former café on Clarkston Road, directly opposite my constituency offices. Every day we would arrive early, push up the metal shutters and wait for the inevitable trickle of constituents – both supportive and hostile – to begin. And every day I would print off a new number and display it in the shop window: the countdown to polling day. This was as much a reminder to activists as voters as to how long we had to complete the tasks of labelling, postering and canvassing we had set ourselves. (And I’ve just remembered that 2005 was the last General Election when candidates in Glasgow could attach posters to lamposts; the council have since banned it, to a mixed response from party activists.)
Despite expectations that Iraq would feature heavily in the campaign, I don’t remember that being the case at grassroots level. It was certainly raised on the doorstep, many times. But most voters for whom Iraq was a barrier to voting Labour were, for the most part, unfailingly polite. And when I asked them how they had previously voted, many of them turned out not to be Labour voters in the first place.
It’s a fact that time goes at a fraction of normal speed during election campaigns – well, if you’re a candidate, anyway. So it took about just under two years from the start of the campaign for polling day to arrive. That was hectic, as usual. I was picked up first thing by my campaign manager and taken to the polling station at the end of my road to cast my vote (and no, I’m not telling you who I voted for – it’s a secret ballot). The previous election, when I was first elected, Carolyn came with me to vote and a press photographer captured the moment for posterity. This time round, however, Carolyn was having to balance work and motherhood, so I voted alone.
Over the long day (about 52 hours, give or take) I tried to visit every polling place in the constituency and exchanged a few words with the tellers and the activists (of all parties) standing outside. There’s always a sense of tense calm on polling day itself, an awareness that the arguments are done and dusted, there’s nothing more to be done except await the voters’ verdict. So there’s little point in falling out with your opponents by then.
It was obvious that the LibDems were making a big effort among the substantial Muslim electorate in Glasgow South, exploiting their highly principled* position on Iraq. And I wasn’t surprised to discover later, at the count, that they had leapfrogged the nationalists to come second.
On BBC1 at ten o’clock, David Dimbleby revealed the exit poll prediction: a Labour majority of just 66 seats. I raised an eyebrow; lower than I had expected. But maybe our majority was being underestimated? It turned out not. At eleven, Carolyn and I left the house and met my election team at Queen’s Park Football Club and a small fleet of vehicles headed to the Scottish Exhibition and Conference Centre for the count.
Ah, yes – the count… In 2001, Cathcart had been counted last of the nine Glasgow seats and Carolyn and I had been very, very late to bed. And so it proved omce more four years later. It was after three in the morning before the Returning Officer called all the candidates together to show us the spoiled ballot papers and to read us the result. I was relieved that my majority had held above the 10,000 mark, although in per centage term it was slightly down on 2001. The LibDem candidate was actually the first person I met that night who told me, quite authoritatively, that I had won.
All I remember about the actual announcement of my result was being accosted by three or four reporters as I walked down from the platform immediately afterwards and asked whether or not I thought Tony Blair should resign. Well, of course he should! After all, he surely had to be punished for leading Labour to a third election victory in a row! The b*****d…
I had always believed that Tony’s announcement in 2004 that he would lead the party into one more Genereal Election and then serve a full term before stepping down was a mistake; the frenzied media speculation which began at 10.00 pm on polling day was entirely predictable.
Tired to the point of exhaustion, Carolyn and I headed back to the social club at Queen’s Park where we were just in time to see Galloway’s victory over Oona King in Bethnal Green. Then, a moron from a neighbouring Constituency Labour Party who, shall we say, had faced some difficulty in reconciling his own views on Iraq with the government’s, called me a fascist. Comradeship, eh? But I was too tired to make a big deal of it. Instead, after one drink, we headed home.
As we got ready for bed, I noticed I had received a voicemail from Jim Knight, who was defending a majority of 153 in South Dorset. He was calling with the happy news that, against the odds, he had increased that to 1812. That was a nice note on which finally to go to sleep.
* yeah, right…
Next instalment: 1983














Friday 5 February 2010 at 10:31 pm
No good reason for a different national result this time, just as per 2001.
Friday 5 February 2010 at 10:31 pm
Since when has Glasgow not voted Labour, it’s one of Labour’s safest areas.
Friday 5 February 2010 at 10:32 pm
“Since when has Glasgow not voted Labour”
1983 (I think) was the first election that didn’t return any Tory MPs in Glasgow. Well, you did ask.
Friday 5 February 2010 at 10:33 pm
I remember spending the evening with people from Young Labour at Glasgow Caledonian Students’ Union. Left at about 3am, having quite clearly lost the majority sweepstake.
Got home, saw my former MP had tricked some gullible Londoners into taking him, spent the next hour spitting blood every time he opened his mouth.
Spoke to a few nice Labour MPs who visited us too.
Friday 5 February 2010 at 11:38 pm
Despite my own views on Iraq I would always be polite! And I thought the fall of Oona King was very sad for her and for her constituents, more importantly. Since then I have read her book and whilst I think it is even more of a shame that her constituents lost her, I think her own life with her partner and child must surely have been happier over the last five years being out of it all. Good luck to her though. Lovely lady. I remember the Paxman / Galloway interview, which was quite amusing! I remember seeing Tony Blair in endless studios being shouted at by people, and that he didn’t know how ridiculous the system of making Doctors appointments is. And I remember Tony and Gordon travelling the country saying don’t vote Lib Dem because it will let the Tories in. And I remember poor old Charlie Kennedy trying to explain their tax policies after a long night up with the baby….
Saturday 6 February 2010 at 12:43 am
I remember that night too. It was darker than expected: Galloway’s victory was the first and only chance we had to open the bubbly.
Saturday 6 February 2010 at 9:25 am
cathy ‘—the fall of Oona King was very sad for her and for her constituents,’
don’t be too unhappy for her, she is now on a nice little earner at c4 (head of diversity). whether her former constituents are unhappy,who knows ?
Saturday 6 February 2010 at 10:04 am
What!? An ex-MP is earning a living? No way! That’s outrageous! Have the police been informed?
Saturday 6 February 2010 at 12:46 pm
‘Since when has Glasgow not voted Labour, it’s one of Labour’s safest areas’
In the 1950s the Tories got the majority of votes in Scotland – and in Glasgow too i think, and of course well after the Red Clydeside era.
Voting patterns are not written on tablets of stone. I was taking photographs of the Passionara statue the other week opposite the trades union bastion (as it once was) across the Clyde. It’s only a few decades since the hard left held huge influence over Scottish politics, and even less time since we heard serious commentators arguing whether or not the Sheridan Trots would displace the old left.
Well they’ve both gone; Sherry was beaten by the BNP in Springburn, and the old left hero Jimmy Reid is now an SNP member – a member of a party led by a man who says that Scotland welcomed ‘economic’ Thatcherism.
The only certain prediction is that politics will get dirtier and nastier; probably the two dirtiest electoral fights of the last general election were in the Western Isles, and in Oona King’s seat (and what a loss she was), both seats in which appeals to religious sensibilities ensured the overthrow of good MPs.
Saturday 6 February 2010 at 1:06 pm
Well I remember Teddy Taylor being a conservative MP for Cathcart, which included Castlemilk in those days. So the idea that Glasgow just votes Labour is an exaggeration of the fact that we *tend* to vote Labour. It isn’t automatic.
I agree with Tom that the Iraq war did not actually make a difference in 2005, although I am quite sad about that I think it should have. There may have been a few votes cast accordingly, but they would have gone to the SNP, the Lib Dems are nowhere in Glasgow South and Tom knows that. He is looking at one party and one party only as his opposition.
The Tories will win the GE, or at least put Labour out of power. Not because they deserve it, they are the same barstewards they’ve always been, but because Labour deserve to lose. So the Tories will have a mandate of some sort, even if it’s only out of a general sense of disgust.
Although not here, which will be welcome news for the SNP.
Saturday 6 February 2010 at 1:18 pm
I’ve just realised looking at my pre-moderated post that I am in fact talking rubbish (before anyone else tells me I will volunteer it).
Glasgow South is a good seat for the libs, one of the few, and they may in fact have gained seats from Labour due to Iraq.
Note to self, think before you post.
Saturday 6 February 2010 at 4:26 pm
Tom will you be at Bonhams of Knightsbridge on Feb 24th?
Saturday 6 February 2010 at 6:57 pm
Ach I do it all the time Observer – good job nobody notices!
Saturday 6 February 2010 at 7:51 pm
Then, a moron from a neighbouring Constituency Labour Party who, shall we say, had faced some difficulty in reconciling his own views on Iraq with the government’s, called me a fascist. Comradeship, eh?
Grade A twuntery there, classic example of the weird double-think (still with us) that Blair and his supporters were somehow worst fascists than Saddam.
the Iraq war did not actually make a difference in 2005 …
A woman (Tory supporter) I knew at the time said she couldn’t understand why the Tories hadn’t used Iraq against Blair more. Erm – that would be because, in parliament, they had voted in favour of the invasion. To do him some credit, Michael Howard was fairly circumspect in what he said about Iraq and Blair, although he did indulge in a lot of hypothetical pontificating with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight. And he also took advantage of the anger about Iraq by suggesting the electorate give Blair a ‘bloody nose’.
For Blair’s opponents, Iraq was a gift that kept on giving. Tory supporters actually far out-did the LibDems in their demonising of Blair, if the sort of stuff which surfaced on the internet was anything to go by. It was a truth universally acknowledged that Blair was ‘Bliar’. He was a liar, a war-monger, in fact he was a sort of cross between Idi Amin and Hitler. (Poor old Cherie was also a target for reasons to do with her looks, dress-sense, fat legs, Scouseness and alleged outrageous materialism.) If Blair couldn’t be put on trial at the Hague, then he was certainly going to be punished at the ballot box. The fact that Blair was still voted back in seemed to show that most voters – although mindful of Iraq – didn’t regard it as valid enough reason to vote for a government led by Michael Howard.
Saturday 6 February 2010 at 8:17 pm
Clearly Iraq shifted lots of votes away from Labour and towards other parties, particularly the LibDems, at a national level. hence the large drop in our majority. I wasn’t saying otherwise, only that at a local level, it didn’t seem to be mentioned as often as I had expected.
Sunday 7 February 2010 at 10:30 am
To my eternal shame, one of my strongest GE recollections is how pretty Kirsty Wark looked.
The following day I found out I wasn’t the only one, Thank God.
Monday 8 February 2010 at 10:59 am
Blair’s decision to announce that he would stand down before another election was a mistake, but an understandable one.
It was clear that the media would hound him on the matter, partly because of Iraq, and he obviously hoped that his announcement would steady Labour’s ship and hold more votes onboard.
But it was quite clear that they wouldn’t stop asking “When?” for ever after til he went.
I wonder that he didn’t just return the compliment and ask the jouros when they would be making their career change.
Leave a comment