I RECEIVED this by email a short time ago from a friend and colleague, Huw Irranca-Davies, the Member for Ogmore.
He clearly shares my disgust at the cynical and hypocritical behaviour of the LibDems in propping up this Tory government. I’m happy to publish it in full:
The Silence of the Lambs
As the Chancellor revealed the true scale of the attacks on the poor and vulnerable, the carnage on jobs and the economy, there was one overpowering visual and aural image that will stay with anyone who was in that Commons chamber: The Silence of the LibDems. Some looked down at the green carpet, some at specks of fluff on their skirts and trousers, all looked away. They couldn’t make eye contact with each other, let alone with the Labour MPs directly opposite.
At the end of Osborne’s shameless assault on working people, on public sector workers, on the low paid and poor, the Conservative massed ranks cheered. Their spirits were up, they’d heard the voice of Thatcher and Friedman rising up through the Chancellor’s throat, and they bellowed their approval. Nothing gets the true blue-blood flowing through their veins more than an all-out attack on the public sector and the poor.
But to the side of the Conservatives was a group of dumbfounded mutes. Like the nice boy from a good family who has been led astray by that rough-type down the road, they sat shame-faced, embarrassed and silent as their new Tory friends cheered themselves into a real mob-frenzy. Just one or two LibDems who’ve clearly bought into the whole “cuts are good, deeper cuts are better” package tried desperately to encourage their compatriots to wave their order-books and cheer. But to no avail. The shame was simply too much for most of the LibDems.
Only weeks ago, they were against these cuts. Only weeks ago, they were against an increase in VAT because we all know it rips into the poor. Only weeks ago they were actually on the right side of the arguments. Their silence is not good enough. They need to stir themselves off the comfortable green benches of the ConDem government and vote against this regressive budget which will damage the economy and disproportionately hurt the poor. Let them put their principles – and the people they represent – above their twenty-two ministerial seats and a few pennies tax off a pint of cider.
In thinking back to that great but brutal film “Silence of the Lambs”, the LibDems should recall what happened to those lambs just after the silence descended. Not pretty. Not good. Off to the slaughterhouse!
The only ones enjoying this are the Conservatives, the new Hannibal Lectors of UK politics.
I would disagree in only one respect: The Silence of the Lambs is a much over-rated film.
























Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 4:33 pm
”poor and vulnerable” infact Tom if you actually look at the figures, It is the poor who shoulder most of the deficit reduction. So no marks for that one.
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 4:40 pm
I resent the implication that I’m a conservative.
Loving every cut. Gideon left me begging for more.
Now to get Barnett sorted and West Lothian solved.
AJ
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 4:41 pm
Of course there is no mention of the fact that had we not been in a situation where “there is no money left” he would not have been able to justify cutting very much or raising taxes or VAT at all , now would he?
And who exactly dealt the hand of cards with which the Government now has to work?
We will find out if Osbourne has got it right in due course. One thing we do know for certain is that his predecessors didn’t. It therefore follows that you have to do something different.
As usual not one iota of acceptance of responsibility from Labour for the situation we are in. Any news on where the £44Bn of cuts in Darling’s figures was coming from by the way??
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 4:42 pm
It’s all well and good criticising the LibDems, for many reasons. However, there are 2 issues that Labour seem to be overlooking.
If the LibDems had formed a coalition with Labour, there would have been a government with even less of a mandate than the current one, and both parties would have to have given concessions in the same way the current coalition has.
Labour lost the election partly because you lost the arguement over how to deal with the deficit. It would appear that most of the electorate still prefer the way this government proposes to try to help the economy recover, but Labour are ignoring that point. Whilst you all continue to criticise the government’s plans, you also are unable to provide a credible alternative. Until you do that, much of your criticisms will continue to look like sour grapes.
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 4:48 pm
Great stuff, that nails it utterly.It must have ben quite harrowing for many Lib Dems to see Clegg and Alexander flanking Osborne and nodding with enthusiasm as the axe was wielded.
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 4:48 pm
Gavin, that made absolutley no sense, what are you talking about?? please explain.
Of course it is an attack on the poor, people on benefits have to make up 11billion of the defecit but banks only bring 2 billion to the party, if this isn’t disproportional and championing the ideologies of the tories then I don’t know what is!!!
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 4:49 pm
Do you actually believe this piffle, Tom? Labour seems to prefer sentimentalism to common sense.
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 4:49 pm
Gavin – what, if anything, does your comment mean?
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 4:50 pm
Frankly, Tom, this is the kind of stuff that may stir the blood of those pre-disposed to hate the Conservatives, but the majority will see “an all-out attack on the public sector and the poor” for the nonsense it is.
Do you really think the Conservatives, or anyone in Politics for that matter, sets out to ‘destroy’ or ‘attack’ the vulnerable deliberately? Think about it, it doesn’t make sense – the one thing today’s politician wants to be is popular.
By all means poke fun at the LibDems, I can imagine they *were* uncomfortable, but the rest is the childish nonsense I thought I’d escaped when I left school.
More importantly, such ridiculous use of language stifles adult debate on how we handle the deficit. I’m going to credit the Labour party with having a plan for this?
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 4:55 pm
“He clearly shares my disgust at the cynical and hypocritical behaviour of the LibDems in propping up this Tory government.”
I stopped reading after that.
First off, the other option wasn’t viable and Miliband the Elder and Balls were not in favour of it.
Secondly, if it is hypocrisy to change your views to make government work then how about Labour becoming “New” Labour to get into office?
Finally, given that I currently owe over £20k, as does my 8 year old nephew and everyone else in this country, things needed to be done to fix that. Conservatives are in the majority in the coalition, so they get to decide the leanings of some of the major aspects, like the budget, so if the Lib-Dems want to get some of their own promises in then they have to support the Conservatives in the other things.
You seem to have the view, as many Labour MPs do, that if the Nick Clegg had gone against his word (thus making him less reputable before he even gets started) and gone for the Lib-Lab pact then everything would have been fine. In fact, you would have had the SNP and Plaid dictating to you all the way through and your government would have been an absolute farce.
End of the day, all this vitriol against the coalition (particularly against the Lib-Dems) only makes you look a waste of space who are only looking for a way back in to power rather than trying to be truly constructive in opposition.
Sort it out!
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 5:12 pm
I really is time you and your Labour colleagues grew up. You lost the election. We have a coalition Government which means there will be compromises. Compromise is what people want to see.
People have seen through New Labour’s mantra that the public and finance sectors are all that matters. The issue is not how much we spend on the public sector but how we spend it.
Every penny of net public expenditure has to be paid for by public sector companies and workers. (Except of course in Labour economics where the Government just borrows, borrows, borrows.)
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 5:21 pm
I’m not sure what you expect.
The Lib Dems could have gone into coalition with Labour, except the numbers really didn’t add up and whether the electorate would have stood for them returning Labour to power, is debateable.
They could have let the Tories form a minority government. They then would have been faced with a budget that was even less to their liking. They could either have voted against it, and precipitated and election, which could have had them punished by the voters and the Tories returned with a majority. Or they could have abstained, and ended up with nothing.
Or they could do what they did, and go into coalition with a view to getting some of what they want but not, as the minor party, all of it.
It’s very easy for politicians, particularly those in opposition, to criticise without suggesting any alternative action.
Tom, what do you think the Lib Dems should have done, and what do you think the outcome would have been?
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 5:28 pm
Before the election, Danny Alexander was (quite rightly) speaking out against the attacks on disabled people through welfare reform; see:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/7768597/Danny-Alexander-hits-out-at-welfare-reforms.html
Now that he is in government, he appears to be standing by and letting this go ahead even though he is quite clear in his mind about the unfairness of it.
I’ll be watching how things unfold to see whether he is a man of principle and conscience…..or not.
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 5:33 pm
Gosh it must be annoying.
Having these awkward people in ‘The Club’ who don’t understand that it’s all about having a jolly fun time, cheering and waving ones order paper around.
Heaven forbid that our legislators should listen to a difficult budget seriously and in silence instead of pulling out their football rattles.
Why is it that so many Labour and Tory MPs don’t seem to understand that they aren’t on the school debating team any more? It’s time Westminster grew up.
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 5:49 pm
Lib/Dem I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice chianti
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 7:02 pm
Huw’s email and Mr Mxyzptik: both very true.
Lib/Dem I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice chianti
LOL
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 7:28 pm
Meanwhile Hattie sends out a rant saying “George Osborne claimed in the Budget speech that his tax rises will make the rich pay most. That is not true either. The Tories have increased VAT from 17.5% to 20%, so that higher prices will be paid in the shops by everyone, from pensioners to the unemployed.”
….and conveniently forgets that there is no VAT on Food, rent, mortgage interest, council tax, books, newspapers etc etc etc (and a minimal rate of VAT on Energy) i.e. those things that make up the vast majority of what those on lower incomes spend their money on.
Those on higher incomes spend a much greater proportion of their outgoings on VAT-able goods because they have the disposable income to do so.
She really does talk cack!
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 7:36 pm
Sorry Tom, you and your colleagues both front and back bench have lost all credibility economically by slavishly supporting the idiot Brown and getting us into the mess we’re in. The Tories will get us out of the s**t you’ve left behind – plus ca change.
Nobody apart from the extreme wing of unite is listening to you anymore
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 7:37 pm
…..and as for claiming the VAT rise will cost the average family an extra £500 a year – that is hilarious. Some simple maths says that’s not possible.
£500 is 2.5% of £20,000. Which in fact translates into £24,000 of VAT inclusive expenditure.
To spend £24,000 (i.e. £2,0000 a MONTH on VATable goods) you must be a 40% tax payer (and not forgetting NI contributions) you will have had to earn over £40,000 p.a before tax just to und the VAT-able spending
And thats spending on top of all the non-VAT-able stuff (food/mortgages/kids clothes etc).
Some “average family”!! Who makes up this crap anyway?
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 8:04 pm
Guess what Tom. I will now be voting for AV. I love coalition government rather than ghastly tribal politics. That is all I have had since the election from my party. All whinging with no strategy or cooperation to reduce the deficit. I was very disappointed in the response by Harriet – no acknowledgement of the difficulties we face. I listened to Liam Byrne on PM – he is someone I have always respected. He talked about people going to the supermarket and paying more. Really? Since when did we pay VAT on food? I thought the budget was excellent given the circumstances we face.
You will not win votes by not providing alternate actions to reduce the budget. Neither will you win votes by slating the Lib Dems. Vince Cable gave an excellent response to the measures as too did Simon Hughes. I have also read tonight that Nick Clegg and Danny Alexander were given a warm welcome and ovation at their meeting of MPs. Of course there will always be dissenters such as Bob Russell and Charles Clarke. I can look at every political party and see dissenters. Look at how well Diane Abbott supported the government since 1997!!!
I am not awfully interested in what people said leading up to the election. This might be interesting to opponents. I am only interested in what this government intends doing to reduce the deficit and improve our lot. I am very happy that they are getting rid of much of the nannying that I have been subject to for some years. I love the openess and that questions are being answered by the PM. It is all rather refreshing. Whether it is PR – I don’t care that I will have the opportunity to contribute as to how the deficit can be reduced. I feel that I am in the loop – something I have not felt since Tony Blair left office.
So sorry Tom. I am not with you – neither am I with the party at the moment. All I can see from the House of commons is aggression, sour grapes, no concern about the state of the country etc etc. I am embarrassed and ashamed.
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 8:36 pm
I see no mention of Brown & darling shafting the poor by doubling income taxes in 2007, and i see no mention of the Thatcherite aping Gordon Brown policy that can be summed up in 3 words, the three little words that made today possable.
Light touch regulation!
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 9:00 pm
Labour at Westminster is reminiscent of Labour at Holyrood after the SNP took over in 2007.
It took more than two years before they accepted thay lost the election.
The only difference is that Labour at Westminster have not changed their tone.
They still blame everything that goes wrong on the other parties, as they did in their years in power.
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 9:41 pm
I would like to refer the Hon. Gentleman to the following post:
http://doctorhuw.wordpress.com/2010/06/20/reality-and-lack-thereof/
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 9:43 pm
I have just done the calculation we are low income retired and we will be £160 better off. That has never happened to us under Labour.We have nevwer been able to claim anything as we have savings.
So this is the best budget for us for 14 years. Thanks to the coalition.
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 9:59 pm
The switch from practicalities of government to the high morals of opposition has to be seen to be believed.
Funny how on the same day Labour are happy to say that Cameron wanted to keep Labour spending until 2008 and then that he really wants to ‘attack the poor’ and always has done. Any mud that will stick hey?
An ‘attack’. Really? What is an attack? The Tories have been accused of an ‘attack on the construction industry’. Is that what they were honestly trying to do. It was a deliberate attempt to do harm to an industry? You think the Tories really want to ‘hurt’ the poor. What, between torturing OAPs and raping servants?
Even if one disagrees on what brought us here, we are still here. Without any serious attempt to outline what you would do, you swing into the argument with erroneous and personal allegations. Every thing steered simply to wedge apart the coalition. What do these tactics say about you?
Pitiful Tom. Your shower of a party bring shame to the institution of Parliament.
What would you cut Tom. Why don’t you tell us?
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 10:16 pm
A LibDem friend of mine has come up with the best suggestion of the day. Time to bring forward the legislation which David Cameron has spoken of, which will allow the electorate to get rid of dodgy MP’s…. which will of-course allow many voters to get rid of 50-odd LibDem MP’s.
On another note, what surely must rank as the most embarassing moment of today’s budget, must be the images of the LibDem Chief Secretary to the Treasury, constantly turning to the PM and nodding away.
Nice to see he is so supportive of hundreds of thousands of people who will loose their jobs in the coming years. Still, Nick Clegg is going to sort out the House of Lords, so we can all relax.
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 10:32 pm
Actually, if you re-watch the budget, you will see the LibDems like Clegg looking around the chamber. It may have been painful, but the Coalition MP’s were accepting responsibility for fixing the economy like adults.
The one to watch is actually Alistair Darling when he was sitting behind Harriet during her reply. He was staring into space with a blank look. You could still see the pain inside when the word ‘Chancellor’ was mentioned and it didnt refer to him. He looked like a broken man.
Where was Ed Balls during all this? In days gone by he would have always been prominant in his front bench seat during events like this. I didnt see him, or any other leadership contender for that matter. I did notice Alan Johnson, the man who should be leading Labour.
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 11:36 pm
Deep down everyone knows this had to be done its just labour and its supporters will never admit it. The poorest are protected. and those on benifit who are fit should look to start work.
I thought George Osbourne came of age with his frank speech. People do not like medicine but if its a cure they take it.
We just cannot afford the size of the public sector and they will now have to go through what everyone else has had to.
Many will not see it that way but this is a good day for Britains future.
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 11:38 pm
Here, here Tom! The Lib-Dems sold their souls for front-bench seats.
Tuesday 22 June 2010 at 11:44 pm
It’s bollocks. The fundamental assumptions (we’re well on the road to sustainable GDP growth recovery and inflation is going to be just where we want it) are a nonsense.
We’ve done a Japan, only with a 5% trade deficit (instead of a big surplus) and a low domestic savings rate (so a big borrowing requirement from foreigners).
Slighly less denial than labour, but only slightly. The fundamental problem (the debt fuelled house price bubble) is still there! It can only be solved by selling loads of residential planning permission and letting the deft deflation go on against a background of real economic growth.
Wednesday 23 June 2010 at 12:26 am
@JN “Deep down everyone knows this had to be done its just labour and its supporters will never admit it. ”
Of course they will never admit it for to do so would be to accept that their management of the economy was a failure.
New Labour got elected on a ticket of economic competence. Some of us knew that was smoke & mirrors in 1997 & in the grand scheme of things it ony took a relatively short time for them to prove just how economically incompetent, unaffordable and unsustainable Labour ideology is.
If they now admit that incompetence they effectively consign themselves to electoral oblivion. Regardless, if Osbourne’s figures more or less pan out over the next four years Labour will be helped well downn the road to that position whether they like it or not.
Wednesday 23 June 2010 at 9:05 am
Tom, the Liberal Democrats added fairness to this budget so grim though yesterday was it would have been a lot worse if the Tories had been governing alone.
Labour has to take its share of the blame for this – racking up a huge deficit, living way beyond our means, failing to fix the roof when the sun was shining. This mess has to be sorted out.
There is a lot I don’t like about this Budget and supporting it is difficult. I’m particularly concerned about some of the welfare reforms which are going to disproportionately affect women and I’ve written about my concerns in more detail on my own blog.
In the meantime, have a look at my Steamie post which shows the good things the Liberal Democrats have brought to this budget – the CGT rises, the rise in personal allowance, the extra child tax credit help for those on the lowest incomes, the flat rate rises for the lowest paid in the public sector. And we’ve kicked that stupid Tory marriage tax break into the long grass.
http://thesteamie.scotsman.com/viewpost.aspx?id=73
I will never forget how one of Labour’s first acts in Government was to reduce benefits to lone parents so remember that before you criticise.
Thursday 24 June 2010 at 11:00 am
I did not see the press coverage of the budget but I can imagine what it was like in the House. I hope the LIB DEMS are enjoying the PARTY and having a taste of power because I don’t think they will ever get it again. How can they, firstly the public will see their vote as a vote for the conservatives and secondly what will their identity be. They are selling themselves out so enjoy it folks while you can.
Sunday 27 June 2010 at 11:25 am
[...] Tom Harris and his friends are less than impressed. [...]
Leave a comment