AFTER queuing impatiently and unsuccessfully yesterday, I finally managed to secure a new iPhone 4 today, and it’s as beautiful and as magnificent a piece of technology as the hype promised. In fact I just finished a long FaceTime (videoconferencing) call with an old friend who happens to be the only other person I know with an iPhone 4 and wi-fi.
(I’ll cut to the chase: no, I don’t intend claiming reimbursement from Ipsa/Payroll for the cost, so please keep the sarcastic/”hilarious” comments to yourself…)
One of the things I wanted to check out was the iBook store. You get a free copy of A.A. Milne’s Winnie the Pooh (read it) as a sample of how books look on the screen. And they do look rather lovely, with perfect detail and easily readable typeface, as well as the original illustrations. But after browsing the online store I considered buying another true literary classic: Douglas Adams’ The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Universe, which I read as a teenager but always intended to re-read and never did.
I downloaded the sample chapters you can look at for free before committing and was intrigued to see that Russell T. Davies had provided the foreword to the latest edition. Recalling fond memories of the importance of the book in his school, Davies wrote:
You’d see that novel, with its cover like neon left out in the rain, jutting out of back pockets and school bags, clutched like a shield, passed from hand to hand like an initiation. Okay, maybe Harry Potter had a similar moment of glory. But you could never fit that into your back pocket. (This new edition still fits, I just checked.) Because that’s what I loved about this version of Hitchhiker’s, above any other; the soft, bendy, riffable paperbackness of it…
Maybe eBooks are going to take over, one day, but not until those whizzkids in Silicon Valley invent a way to bend the corners, fold the spine, yellow the pages, add a coffee ring or two and allow the plastic tablet to fall open at a favourite page.
Ironc, isn’t it, that such a foreword should appear in an e-version of the book?
So that made my mind up. There may well be the occasional book I will want to read in digital form – earlier this year I read a free downloaded copy of Wells’s War of the Worlds – but there are some books which are just too important, or at least are too important to one’s own past, to commit to anything less than proper, actual paper.
And The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy certainly falls into that category.
























Saturday 26 June 2010 at 1:54 am
Just make sure you remember to hold it the right way :p:p !!
http://www.pcworld.com/article/199853/apple_respo...
Saturday 26 June 2010 at 6:26 am
You’ve only just discovered ebooks? Perfect way to while away a long train journey. No, not as satisfying as hardcopies, but it’s one (or rather, one hundred) things less to carry…
Saturday 26 June 2010 at 8:09 am
E-reader’s and the like are perfect for holiday time – no more back wrenchingly heavy suitcases packed with a dozen novels for the beach.
Ours is 18 months old now and feels a bit dated as it doesn’t have a touch screen – but it still does the job and is much lighter than an ipad.
Saturday 26 June 2010 at 9:22 am
Long time since I’ve read it, but wasn’t the actual guide itself an e-book?
Saturday 26 June 2010 at 9:46 am
Good point!
Saturday 26 June 2010 at 10:47 am
One other thing about e-Books: a well-made book can be read decades after you first bought it, but, with the way modern technology’s going, you’ll have to replace all your e-Books within about five or ten years.
Saturday 26 June 2010 at 10:59 am
Yeah, you beat me to it.
The Guide was a lot hardier, though. In an episode of 'Modern Family', I just watched, Jay was taking his e-book on holiday, planning on having a relaxing time reading, but at the airport, grandson Luke, sat on it, breaking the screen. Building electronic stuff to last isn't something we do, because, as Joe and Mr X averred to, they become obsolete pretty quickly.
Saturday 26 June 2010 at 11:51 am
I just can't seem to focus on reading things that aren't on paper. I know it's very non-green of me but even when I have 50 page articles to read, I can't focus on them off a screen, I have to print them off. Although, I do print 2 pages per sheet AND duplex to keep the environmental cost down.
Saturday 26 June 2010 at 1:40 pm
I am not enamoured even though so many people want to buy me one as a present!! I have read all the reviews as well as articles by many journalists who use them. I purchase hundreds of books a year and could not afford to do so with a reader. No doubt in years to come the price will come down. I keep a record of what books I want to purchase and wait until the price falls I also enjoy maintaining my catalogue. I am not against technology but somehow a book is more than the content for me. I like the feel, the smell etc etc.
Sunday 27 June 2010 at 3:28 am
Quite so, Jane, but if you simply want information, what could be better that electronic availability? I have scanned copies of Richard Feyman’s ‘Lectures on Physics’, but there is a world of difference between the ‘computer pictures’ and handling the real books.
Sunday 27 June 2010 at 8:49 am
but e-books are cheaper than paper ones!
Sunday 27 June 2010 at 11:26 am
[...] 4 came out this week and Tom Harris managed to get his hands on one in fairly short order. He’s not so impressed with the idea of reading books in electronic form, though. In a Bundance hopes he keeps his shiny [...]
Sunday 27 June 2010 at 1:09 pm
“… but there are some books which are just too important, or at least are too important to one’s own past, to commit to anything less than proper, actual paper.”
I feel like that about Nineteen Eighty-Four…
DK
Monday 28 June 2010 at 11:58 am
Davies’s foreword is in the new edition of the paperback, so presume that was the edition they converted into the e-book.
Tuesday 29 June 2010 at 2:35 pm
Books need to be felt, smelt and kept on a bookshelf (Or passed on). I just can't help but think that an e-book is just wrong!
Leave a comment