AFTER much thought and consideration, I spoke in favour of the Regulation of New Media Bill in the Commons last night.
The essential purpose of the legislation, as Andy Burnham, the Culture, Media and Sport Secretary, told the House, is to make sure that new media, like blogs and social networking sites, can’t be used by terrorists (and I accept this is where there will be some disagreement in the blogscape: “terrorists” are defined under Schedule 1 to the Bill as “anyone who pursues a persistent pattern of anti-social or irritating behaviour, such behaviour to be defined as double parking, parking in parent-and-toddler spaces at supermarkets, talking loudly in cinemas or any other activity as defined by the Secretary of State”).
The Bill will also introduce mandatory “politeness and decency” standards (the so-called The Clarkson Rules) which will allow any blog author to be fined if he or she allows any foul language to be used in their comments section. Andy expressed some surprise that this part of the Bill had received the private backing of none other than Paul Staines (aka Guido Fawkes).
But by far the most controversial part of the Bill is the section that demands that, from April 2010, every British blogger will have to submit each post for official approval. My main concern is with regard to the turnaround time; the whole point of blogging could be rendered meaningless or at least blunted if we’re unable to respond timeously to current events. Andy, however, managed to reassure me and the House that posts will be approved by the new regulatory body, BlogOff, within about 36 hours.
This drew sage nods from Tory blogger Iain Dale who was in the Strangers’ Gallery to watch the debate at first hand. In fact he and I had discussed the Bill earlier in the day after I happened upon him, Derek Draper, Alex Hilton and Tim Ireland having a jovial and relaxed meal together in the Terrace Canteen.
The second reading of the Regulation of New Media Bill was agreed without a vote and surprisingly little comment, either in the mainstream media or in the blogscape.
There will, inevitably, be those who will cry “Big Brother!”, even at such light-touch regulatory measures. But blogging can only benefit and prosper with the official stamp of approval from HMG.
I welcome your comments.
UPDATE at 1.45 pm: Admit it, I had some of you there, didn’t I? Come on, admit it! You know who you are…














Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 12:08 am
I saw most of the debate, including your craven performance and I was shocked that someone who runs a blog could give in to this web fascism. I hope your ashamed of yourself.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 12:19 am
April Fool! Nice one Tom/Tim!
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 12:28 am
Your self serving organ fails to mention that most heinous of New Labour Crimes, Creeping Stealth Taxation!!!
Some commentators on the Bill have suggested it is a means to bring about a “Tax on Tweets” saying that out ISPs will be allowed to bill us 5p for every tweet released to pay for the regulation required. Soon only the very rich: Stephen Fry, Jonathan Ross and Bill Gates will be allowed to tweet. You of course will be allowed to continue as you can claim your tweets off your expenses.
This day will go down in history as the day Labour cut the cyber tongue out of the mouth of the people!!!!
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 12:29 am
We responded to the consultation on the previously published White Paper.
We’re disappointed that some aspects have been watered down, such as the requirement to refer to the PM as the ‘Great Leader’.
But on the whole a brilliant piece of legislation which enhance the dynamism of the blogosphere.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 12:37 am
Can I congratulate you on your support for Clause 17 of the Bill, (Bloggers – Removal of Anonymity), which makes it an offence carrying a maximum sentence of 12 months imprisonment or a £1000 fine for anyone to attempt to post a comment on a blog anonymously or under a pseudonym. (With additional penalties for the aggravated offence of wearing a Guy Fawkes’ masks in a profile pic).
At committee stage I hope to introduce an amendment which extends this clause to include a requirement that all those wishing to comment on blogs must in future register in advance on a Government database, giving their name, address, date of birth, fingerprints, DNA and inside leg measurements. Can I count on your support?
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 12:39 am
Not sure, Kerry. Sounds a bit “nanny state”, to be honest…
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 12:41 am
How about if we say we’ll phase it in on a voluntary basis first?
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 12:46 am
This is just typical of this government!! Complete control freaks that lot of you!!
And on today of all days!!
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 12:51 am
Could you clarify jovial and relaxed in context, please? Are we talking with or without sharp instruments?
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 12:56 am
I hope this is an April fool…
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 12:58 am
@Kerry Only if you can take my Right Honourable inside leg measurement, which can vary, depending on a lean to the left or right.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 12:59 am
High time you lefties stopped these unwashed sticky-keyboarders in their tracks.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 1:05 am
About time too if I may say Tom. I’ve just blogged about the headlines in the Guardian and Gordon Brown’s decision that all MPs will be strip searched upon entering and leaving the House. Another excellent policy from your dear leader.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 5:50 am
They’ve already got something like this in Australia. It’s now classified as an internet black hole along with places like China and Saudi Arabia. I saw their creepy Prime Minister on TV the other day doing his version of Blair’s “Diana Moment” over the fires, not an edifying picture and anyway Blair was much better at it. No doubt he’ll be able to swap stories about censorship methods with the Chinese contingent at the G20. It’s only a matter of time until we get something similar over here regardless of the party in power.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 6:15 am
Come on guys look at the date.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 6:42 am
Never mind we will soon have a Tory government, then we can all blog away about New labour.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 6:46 am
If only you had said this in 146 characters or less I would take it seriously and submit to The Guardian.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 7:05 am
Not as good as Guardians twitter piece today April 1 though ….
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 7:07 am
Tom
I am surprised that in your summary of the debate you don’t mention Clause 94 section 2 which discusses state funding for all blogs.
This is also a very welcome change and will certainly add to the number and quality of blogs.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 7:20 am
Very disapointed Tom. The web is about freedom and now you want to remove some, then some more and so it will go on till you have total control. Just leave it alone.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 7:21 am
that b***ard Draper left before paying his share of the bill!
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 7:23 am
I just hope its an April Fool.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 7:26 am
I agree entirely. It’s the only way to help hard working families in these global times.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 7:36 am
Labour is obviously running scared of the Tory blogs. LaboursList, GoFourth etc are just tedious left-wing propaganda sites and are not interested in a debate if it involves criticism of Labour, the Dear Leader or any of his minions.
Labour’s policy: If you can’t beat them (or even put up a decent opposition) enact a draconian law to prevent them.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 7:59 am
I notice that sadly the ammendment from Lynne Featherstone on Equal representation on blogrolls during election periods was ludicrously voted down by the two main parties. When will you two give into the fact that the days of two party politics is over.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 8:00 am
I see the Mail Online has yet another picture of you (without tie) in the Editor’s Six of the Best. Scroll down past the pic of the Home Sec caught coming out of an Ann Summers.
Did Carolyn take this pic of you???
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 8:01 am
What most suprised me was the last minute amendment agreed that MPs should be breathalysed on entering the House. After all, can’t have anyone trying to run the country under the influence of alcohol (as opposed to under the influence of PR consultancies)
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 8:21 am
Happy April Fool’s day
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 9:08 am
This regulation of the blogs is only happening because Labour do not have control of it. Simple.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 9:27 am
I’m surprised you lot didn’t take the opportunity while you had the chance to introduce a test, kind of like the driving test, called, let me think, the ideological purity test as a prerequisite to being allowed to blog:-).
Very nicely done, Tom.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 9:27 am
So nice to hear that Iain and Derek have made up. I’m looking forward to Dolly’s take on Labourlist, though judging by how quick he updates his site, he probably won’t get around to posting it until tomorrow!
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 10:07 am
“Tom voted strongly against a transparent parliament.”
Words fail me.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 10:08 am
Took me tooo long to get this. I am stupid.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 10:15 am
A last the government is listening! I had almost given up but Labour has at last taken the hgih groung of sensible, light touch regulation.
One slight worry though is the ‘declaration of Party Membership clause’ – could you put forward an ammendment to strike this down?
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 10:17 am
Have they started the spaghetti harvest yet?
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 10:18 am
This is all an attempt to distract attention from EU Directive AQW123/456 which will require blogs to be published simultaneously in every EU language except Welsh. Another feeble attempt by Westminster to look important.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 10:19 am
@Kerry 12.37 – I trust that your amendment will also include a questionnaire which details the lifestyle choices of potential bloggers/commentators? If we want to improve the quality in the blogosphere we do need only those who optimise their health and there is overwhelming evidence of the link between quality of posts and eating five a day, drinkjng two units a day, attending quit smoking clinics and jogging round the block singing ‘The Red Flag’.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 10:23 am
Yes, yes — but what kind of allowances will be available to bloggers and those contributing to blogs? John Lewis is showing a new six hob range with optional BBQ attachment I’m rather attracted to. And my main home is a tent in the Cairngorms, but I really feel the need for a small pied-a-terre in Mayfair.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 10:32 am
“In fact he and I had discussed the Bill earlier in the day after I happened upon him, Derek Draper, Alex Hilton and Tim Ireland having a jovial and relaxed meal together in the Terrace Canteen”
What a lovely little life you all have. Most people I know are crippled by worry about how they’re going to manage, while you lot enjoy “jovial” meals subsidised by the taxpayer.
Ca ira!
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 10:38 am
A leaked document shows that a Blogger re-education camp is planned for Foula. The official title will be “The Alaister Campbell Centre for Truth and Reconciliation”
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 10:43 am
Uh. So how, EXACTLY can one tell when a blog is being “used” by a terrorist?
Also, we all know what happens with New Labour legislation. It does NOT do what it says on the can – witness RIPA, and the pathetic sight of Ms. Supremely-Underqualified Yvette Copper on Question Time last year, when asked about council abuse of RIPA, wailed “it wasn’t meant to be used that way”.
Actually, Yvette – it just shit lawmaking. The hallmark of New Labour.
Now, excuse me. I just have to go and vomit. Just heard Brown fawning all over Obama.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 10:43 am
Also, what do you do when the blog is hosted elsewhere? Invade them?
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 10:44 am
It’s about time you over-paid, under-worked, over-housed, no-good politicos started to focus on the real issues affecting the common man. For far too long political blogging has gone unpunnis… unregulated, and I welcome such moves as the creation of the independent Bloggoff. Let’s all face the fact that Tom lets so much right wing tripe onto this blog that self moderation has obviously failed to provide a balanced pro-labour discussion.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 10:49 am
Is this an April Fool? Submitting Blog posts for approval?
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 10:59 am
…Is this a joke?
The quip about terrorists in the second paragraph gives me hope, but in the Kafkaesque country in which I find myself I find myself doubting.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 11:00 am
Superb post! Wish I had written it. A good chortle from start to finish. All power to your elbow.
(I’m in training for the new regime)
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 11:08 am
There I was wondering how I could smuggle in some Uzis or something to fight the Stasi, and then I looked at the computer clock.
Oh thats not fair. I’ve aged five years.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 11:17 am
State funding of blogs. Yes. It can be added to the fact the the government is now the largest spender of advertising (all telling us what we must not do) in the country? Indeed, it is quite possible they are propping up the likes of ITV.
Oh what joy to be a taxpayer! Hallooo. We now have the honour of picking up Royal Mail pensions, and sorting out the shortfall MPs pensions are in.
Odd they don’t give a shit that I will in all likelihood have an old age of poverty, despite once having had a pension pot – saved by me & my company – of £180,000.
It’s now down to £100,000
Thanks Gordon.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 11:19 am
I’m not sure about the Regulation of New Media Bill, but I would certainly support legislation aimed at regulating commenters.
Many bloggers struggle with the dilemma of blog moderation policy, couldn’t we just simplify the whole thing by making comments illegal?
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 11:22 am
“foul language”
To be defined by the Minister For Foul Language.
Where the **** do you find these people, Tom?
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 11:25 am
This Bill is, in fact, redundant. Current legislation allows for all blogs to be banned under anti-terrorist laws and being found in possession of a blog should bring long sentences. There is, however, a need in current legislation for additional provisions regarding shorter sentences with good grammar.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 11:29 am
Free expression is a cornerstone of a healthy civil society, itself vital to a well functioning democracy. Centralised control and authoritarian approaches to governance stifle, not least, free expression, but further individuals’ sense of freedom and aspiration; in these troubled times the more hope and drive and motivation to excel our people have, the better placed we may be to compete in the 21st century. Indeed, a free civil society should allow the free expression of dissension, including that by individuals lately labelled ‘terrorists’. It is through rational engagement with dissenting voices, through dialog and a commitment to communication, that we can build a tougher more resiliant society. Shutting out those voices is a disgraceful approach to nuturing a strong civil society, and our representatives should be ashamed of such a grotesque betrayl of our national values.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 11:32 am
You sir, are a jumped up fascist.
You forgot you must serve the people – not control the people. The people will sack you.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 11:33 am
A la lanterne you porcine trough swilling nomenklatura. The people will know and the truth will always get out.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 11:35 am
First the joke (very good), but soon the jack booted reality – the EU doesn’t have 1st April in its Calendar.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 11:45 am
What about hard blogging families? What’s in it for them?
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 11:46 am
This is more plausible than some of the true stories about our government – so I don’t get the joke…
Labour could easily see today as a ‘good day to bury bad news’.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 11:46 am
Is it 1st April or have I not woken up yet and this is a dream?
Nice one, Tom.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 11:47 am
I’m calling April fool on this one. Surely?
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 11:49 am
April fool?
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 11:54 am
Maybe my irony-meter isn’t working well, but some of these comments seem to be taking your post rather seriously.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 12:08 pm
Hey Tim – April Fool it may be, but please please don’t go giving your dear leader ideas. He has carried out enough bad ones to last the next 3 generations already.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 12:09 pm
Can I express my support for this amusing initiative. I hope it is repeated in some form before noon on April 1 2010!
Well done…..
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 12:12 pm
After talks with the Secretary of State I can confirm that I have agreed to become the first Chair of the new media watchdog.
I feel ‘OfBlog’ will play a crucial part in ensuring that the internet remains a platform for the many and not the few.
As such, I have agreed to personally moderate all comments on every UK blog.
This will also allow me to improve and correct each comment, thanks to my well renowned grasp of grammar and syntax.
JP
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 12:13 pm
Your position on this appears to be that it is fine to limit free speech based on the fact the secretary of state may find it irritating. I am disgusted and appalled.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 12:18 pm
Nice one Tom. We bloggers take our selves too seriously. The trouble is we may have had you MPs swinging from the lamp posts before we got the joke.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 12:21 pm
That’s News asks: “What about hard blogging families? What’s in it for them?”
Thank you for asking. We are offering real help now. By monitoring everything you do we can offer you better help than ever – now – when it matters most to you and your family, in the recession that the Americans started.
We are not like the Conservatives who would just do nothing. We want to read your emails, listen to your telephone calls and open your letters, so that we can find out what you really think and offer you the realest help available.
I must correct a factual error by David at 10:38 am who said that “a Blogger re-education camp is planned for Foula.”
This would be absurd. Our re-education camps will be in every major town and city offering real help to people who need to understand that they must accept our real help now.
In my next post I’ll tell you why I really sacked Tom Harris.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 12:42 pm
A most amusing and elaborate gull, and yet, judging by comments on Guido and here, a shocking number of people fell for it. Makes you wonder..
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 1:14 pm
You nearly had me for a minute.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 2:03 pm
Reading the comments is even funnier than the orignal story!!
All-time classic april fool?
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 3:17 pm
I especially like Boudicca’s comment. Also note that she despises Labour blogs so much she can’t keep away from them.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 3:31 pm
Please don’y give your more nasty friends ideas like this one, Tom. They’re bad enough as it is, and they _might_, just might, take you seriously.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 4:04 pm
Fascist.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 4:28 pm
Sad thing is, it is actually very hard to tell the difference between Labour Party Policy concerning the net and April fools.
Particularly where Burnham sticks his oar in.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 5:42 pm
Thats very funny!
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 6:01 pm
hopefully just another april fool, otherwise we’d be better off living in Zimbabwe
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 6:06 pm
Hilarious.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 7:11 pm
I trust this is an April fool. However it’s becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish hoaxs from government proposals. There is also the risk of giving Andy Burnham ideas which may be used to implement his plan to transform the web into an online version of radio 4.
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 7:12 pm
This would actually be funnier if it came from a party other than the one that does in fact actually want to create a Big Brother state
Remind me, which country has the highest concentration of CCTV cameras in the world and wants to record every email and phone call? (not an April fools sadly, although it is a joke)
Wednesday 1 April 2009 at 7:48 pm
And Jackboot Jackie has to personally approve every one
Thursday 2 April 2009 at 8:54 am
Zanu are so into “mind control” nothing they say (even as a jest) suprises me.
Just Bad taste… as ever.
Leave a comment